Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6D44B380000EC; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:29:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U8uYP-0004GI-9D for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:28:53 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U8uYO-0004G9-RS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:28:52 +0000 Received: from smtpa1.mediabeam.com ([194.25.41.13]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U8uYM-0008Pu-EH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:28:51 +0000 Received: from IMAP1 (balancer7.mediabeam.com [10.100.1.80]) by smtpa1.mediabeam.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r1MFSTxo025232 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:28:29 +0100 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:28:27 +0100 From: uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Lubos, Peter an Stefan, yes, yes, I confess. thanks for congrats, Lubos. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [194.25.41.13 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 34d483c57c7a6bf26c25db3c8765d5fc Subject: Re: Re: LF: VLF_signal Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----B7F8D9471E264529951550A33B3D9039" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME,PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408551278eed753d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ------B7F8D9471E264529951550A33B3D9039 Content-type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Lubos, Peter an Stefan, yes, yes, I confess=2E thanks for congrats, Lubos=2E I`m testing a new QRG generator as playing around with the vy nice Spe= cLab program with its possibility to control the sample rate by GPS=2E Some days ago I used a stand alone GPS controlled exciter on 8970,0225= Hz , now it should be 8970,000Hz (where have the five mHz gone?)=2E =20 GL Uwe/dj8wx=20 Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg Gesendet: 22=2E02=2E2013 16:13 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg Betreff: Re: LF: VLF_signal Ah, interesting! I can see that trace here as well, http://www=2Eiup=2E= uni-heidelberg=2Ede/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber=2Ehtml=2E First i th= ought it is local but if you see the sam then someone must do a test :-= ) Who is it? :-) It is very strong at Paul Nicholson, http://abelian=2Eorg/vlf/fbins=2E= shtml#p=3D1361538000&b=3D090&s=3Dsp=2E Seems to come from E-W=2E So it = could be DJ8WX again? 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 22=2E02=2E2013 06:27, schrieb Lubos OK2BVG: =20 Hello VLF!=20 There is a strong signal on 8969,995Hz visible on my grabber=2E It is r= eally good signal, it is visible in both, DFCW6000 and DFCW600 windows=2E= =A0=20 Whose is it?=A0=20 Congratulation, TX and antenna are good doing :-)=20 Lubos, OK2BVG ------B7F8D9471E264529951550A33B3D9039 Content-type: text/html; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Lubos, Peter an Stefan,

yes, yes, I confess=2E

thanks for
congrats, Lubos=2E

I`m testing a new QRG generator as playing ar= ound with the vy nice SpecLab program with its possibility to control t= he sample rate by GPS=2E

Some days ago I used a stand alone GPS controlled exciter = on 8970,0225Hz , now it should be 8970,000Hz (where have the five mHz g= one?)=2E

GL
Uwe/dj8wx



Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg
Gesendet: 22=2E02=2E2013 16:13
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg
Betreff: Re: LF: VLF_signal


Ah, interesting! I can see that trace here as well, http://www=2Eiup=2Eun= i-heidelberg=2Ede/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber=2Ehtml=2E First i thought it is local but if you see the sam then someone must do a test :-)
Who is it? :-)
It is very strong at Paul Nicholson, http://abelian=2Eorg/vl= f/fbins=2Eshtml#p=3D1361538000&b=3D090&s=3Dsp=2E Seems to come from E-W=2E So it could be DJ8WX again?

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 22=2E02=2E2013 06:27, schrieb Lubos OK2BVG:
Hello VLF!
There is a strong signal on 8969,995Hz visible on my grabber=2E It is really good signal, it is visible in both, DFCW6000 and DFCW600 windows=2E  
Whose is it? 
Congratulation, TX and antenna are good doing :-)

Lubos, OK2BVG
------B7F8D9471E264529951550A33B3D9039--