Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22129 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2002 13:24:05 -0000 Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by mailstore with SMTP; 16 Dec 2002 13:24:05 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 20177 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2002 13:24:00 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 16 Dec 2002 13:23:59 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 18NvDg-0004sV-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:23:40 +0000 Received: from [152.163.225.101] (helo=imo-r05.mx.aol.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18NvDe-0004sM-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:23:38 +0000 Received: from RaySoifer@cs.com by imo-r05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id l.e6.3318caae (17377) for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 08:22:50 -0500 (EST) From: RaySoifer@cs.com Message-ID: Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 08:22:50 EST To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: CompuServe 7.0 for Windows US sub 10504 Subject: Re: LF: QSO format Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=5.0tests=NO_REAL_NAME,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01version=2.42 X-Spam-Level: ** Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Laurie, John et al,

Since I'm not directly involved, I should probably keep my mouth shut, but from experience in other forms of weak-signal work I might suggest reserving "R" for "Roger" and just sending the signal report, whether "O", "5" or whatever.  If the receiving station would like the report repeated, how about "?" rather than "R?"

73,

Ray, W2RS