Return-Path: Received: from rly-dd05.mx.aol.com (rly-dd05.mail.aol.com [172.19.141.152]) by air-dd03.mail.aol.com (v121.5) with ESMTP id MAILINDD032-b7c48286e5910; Mon, 12 May 2008 12:21:11 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dd05.mx.aol.com (v121.5) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDD056-b7c48286e5910; Mon, 12 May 2008 12:20:44 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Jvaky-0007Vo-Tm for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 17:20:08 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Jvaky-0007Vf-Dp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 17:20:08 +0100 Received: from imo-m13.mx.aol.com ([64.12.143.101] helo=imo-m13.mail.aol.com) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Jvakw-0007rm-6s for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 17:20:08 +0100 Received: from G4gvw@aol.com by imo-m13.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.4.) id l.d60.29cbefea (41810) for ; Mon, 12 May 2008 12:19:52 -0400 (EDT) From: G4gvw@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 12:19:48 EDT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5035 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.212,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,NO_REAL_NAME=0.55 Subject: Re: LF: RE: email qso Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1210609187" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : + -------------------------------1210609187 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, I personally cannot see what is wrong with a experiment in which transmissions are made in one mode and on a particular frequency and reports are received by way of another mechanism or method. Such an experimental method is certainly permitted under the terms of not only the general licence but also under the terms of the NoV. I can personally vouch for the acceptability of this by precedence having in the past held a licence permitting precisely that arrangement for the purpose of antenna experiments for commercial purposes. In the race of life put a big bet on the nag named "Self-Interest" - He will always be in there trying hard ! 73 de Pat G4GVW qth Near Felixstowe, East coast of UK -------------------------------1210609187 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,

I personally cannot see what is wrong with a experiment in which=20 transmissions are made in one mode and on a particular frequency and reports= are=20 received by way of another mechanism or method. Such an experimental method=20= is=20 certainly permitted under the terms of not only the general licence but also= =20 under the terms of the NoV.

I can personally vouch for the acceptability of this by precedence havi= ng=20 in the past held a licence permitting precisely that arrangement for the pur= pose=20 of antenna experiments for commercial purposes.

In the race=20 of life put a big bet on the nag named "Self-Interest" - He will always be i= n=20 there trying hard !

73 de Pat G4GVW

qth Near Felixstowe, East=20 coast of UK

-------------------------------1210609187--