Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp164849igb; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 07:05:33 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.12.12 with SMTP id u12mr17984609wib.48.1385996732734; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 07:05:32 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v7si25997896wjw.95.2013.12.02.07.05.32 for ; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 07:05:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@kabelmail.de Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VnUVo-000130-7r for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 14:30:12 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VnUVn-00012r-Nk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 14:30:11 +0000 Received: from smtpa1.mediabeam.com ([194.25.41.13] helo=smtpa2.mediabeam.com) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VnUUY-0005aE-Ib for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 14:30:10 +0000 Received: from IMAP1 (balancer7.mediabeam.com [10.100.1.80]) by smtpa2.mediabeam.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id rB2ESXRV019110 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 15:28:34 +0100 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=kabelmail.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kabelmail.de; s=mail; t=1385994514; bh=ZTRwM1j/Z2GTaK790I7J7f8JWZYY2HA/jAf7/txHJFg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=y28V50Q3YP3YrJa+j01ajGNJQxph6AfZPG510vmdUzHC7KckOux7oJ41h/d+1MVlh lMxM7HG76xRzkjL1sF3Ayp/kBJndEy1HRuHM7JEoLomqUMwFsY7ej23s+9Yj6LCsU1 nhQYYRTKRYtBBWmSWFbJFowRFBjdgwWBsB15NSWI= Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 15:28:33 +0100 From: uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi all, its a foggy and rainy day today producing mni ghostly sparks in the yard. so I switched the Tx off at 1251UTC. until tomorrow I guess. GL Uwe/dj8wx jo43sv [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [194.25.41.13 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: f9bb43a66658129469273581af35b296 Subject: Re: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands. Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----87913FBE025B43C7BF9D3B84DCD4CE3E" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME,PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3471 ------87913FBE025B43C7BF9D3B84DCD4CE3E Content-type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, its a foggy and rainy day today producing mni ghostly sparks in the ya= rd=2E so I switched the Tx off at 1251UTC=2E until tomorrow I guess=2E=20 GL Uwe/dj8wx jo43sv Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg Gesendet: 02=2E12=2E2013 12:18 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg Betreff: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands=2E Hi Peter,=20 Probably your detection on 8969=2E996 was local QRM since the line app= eared and disappeared with the QRM of your battery charger=2E See the i= mage=2E=2E=2E 73, Stefan Am 01=2E12=2E2013 23:44, schrieb PA1SDB, Peter: =20 In my oppinion the signal was buch better on 8969,996 in relation to 89= 70,022 Hz=2E=20 Is it possible to=A0make a sweep from xx to xx ?=20 Peter, PA1SDB=20 www=2Eqsl=2Enet/pa1sdb=20 ----- Original Message ----- =20 From: uwe-jannsen@kabelmail=2Ede =20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg =20 Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 10:39 PM=20 Subject: Re: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands=2E=20 Hi Peter, may be the generator was out of control=2E as told here I had some tro= uble with it=2E GL Uwe/dj8wx jo43sv Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg Gesendet: 01=2E12=2E2013 21:51 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg Betreff: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands=2E Hello Uwe,=20 I'm wondering what was/is the difference between that=A08969,996 Hz tra= nsmission=A0Saturday=A0(A) and this Sunday transmission=A0(B) on 8970,0= 22 Hz ?=20 There where some unstabillity's here localy, so perhaps=A0the reason is= something here localy ?????=20 I did start the PC,=A0and connected a=A0car battery loader at=A0(18h00)= front of that bright part befor A=20 I did diconnect the loader (05h33)=A0at A and the signal dissapared to=2E= =2E=2E=20 Later on the signal became=A0bright and clear at 8970,022 Hz=2E=20 Wondering why the signal=A0befor mark A was better in relation to B=A0=20 Was it you on 8969,996 Hz ?=20 Best 73's, Peter PA1SDB ------87913FBE025B43C7BF9D3B84DCD4CE3E Content-type: text/html; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,

its a foggy and rainy day today producing mni ghostly sparks in the yar= d=2E so I switched the Tx off at 1251UTC=2E
until tomorrow I guess=2E

GL
Uwe/dj8wx jo43sv

Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg
Gesendet: 02=2E12=2E2013 12:18
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg
Betreff: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands=2E

Hi Peter,

Probably your detection on 8969=2E996 was local QRM since the line appeared and disappeared with the QRM of your battery charger=2E See th= e image=2E=2E=2E

73, Stefan

Am 01=2E12=2E2013 23:44, schrieb PA1SDB, Peter:
In my oppinion the signal wa= s buch better on 8969,996 in relation to 8970,022 Hz=2E
Is it possible to make = a sweep from xx to xx ?
 
Peter, PA1SDB
 
www=2Eqsl=2Enet/pa1sdb<= /div>
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:= uwe-jannsen@kabelmail=2Ede
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands=2E

Hi Peter,
may be the generator was out of control=2E as told here I had some trouble with it=2E
GL
Uwe/dj8wx jo43sv
Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg
Gesendet: 01=2E12=2E2013 21:51
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg
Betreff: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands=2E

Hello Uwe,
I'm wondering what was/is the difference between that 8969,996 Hz transmission Saturday=  (A) and this Sunday transmission (B) on 8970,022 Hz ?
 
There where some unstabillity's here localy, so perhaps the reason is something her= e localy ?????
 
I did start the PC, and connected a car battery loader at (18h00) front of that brigh= t part befor A
I did diconnect the loader (05h33) at A and the signal dissapared to=2E=2E=2E
Later on the signal became bright and clear at 8970,022 Hz=2E
 
Wondering why the signal befor mark A was better in relation to B 
 
Was it you on 8969,996 Hz ?<= /span>
 
3D"" 
 
Best 73's, Peter PA1SDB
 
 
 
------87913FBE025B43C7BF9D3B84DCD4CE3E--