X-GM-THRID: 1241081438804110844 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.78.172.10 with SMTP id u10cs486860hue; Thu, 5 Jul 2007 05:14:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.97.7 with SMTP id u7mr4632499hub.1183637666598; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 05:14:26 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f3si17013470nfh.2007.07.05.05.14.22; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 05:14:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1I6QBG-0002ZK-Lm for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 13:11:30 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1I6QBG-0002ZB-7j for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 13:11:30 +0100 Received: from imo-m24.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.5]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1I6QBD-0002J8-TH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 13:11:30 +0100 Received: from G0MRF@aol.com by imo-m24.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.2.) id l.cee.13f3b223 (41809) for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2007 08:11:16 -0400 (EDT) From: G0MRF@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 08:11:16 EDT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5014 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.497,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,NO_REAL_NAME=0.55 Subject: Re: LF: 500 - beacons Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1183637476" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 7175 -------------------------------1183637476 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 05/07/2007 08:04:25 GMT Standard Time, G3vtt@aol.com writes: Hi Dave, I'mm CC on 501.5 and 502. Could beacons be put higher in the band say at 503? 73 Colin G3VTT Thanks Colin. All noted. Thank you. I did see a request when the band was first available to keep the top end clear for QSOs with the DLs on 505. But I've never seen any reports of QSOs between those frequencies so perhaps 503+ could be good. 73 David -------------------------------1183637476 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In a message dated 05/07/2007 08:04:25 GMT Standard Time, G3vtt@aol.com= =20 writes:

Hi Dave,

I'mm CC on 501.5 and 502. Could beacons be put higher in the band say= at=20 503?

73

Colin G3VTT

Thanks Colin.

All noted. Thank you.

I did see a request when the band was first available to keep the top e= nd=20 clear for QSOs with the DLs on 505. But I've never seen any repo= rts=20 of QSOs between those frequencies so perhaps 503+ could be good.

David

-------------------------------1183637476--