Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2834 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2001 23:15:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 23:15:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 20905 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2001 23:14:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 23:14:43 -0000 X-Priority: 3 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15cas5-0000mf-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 00:05:13 +0100 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from imo-m03.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.6]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15cas3-0000ma-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 00:05:11 +0100 Received: from G0MRF@aol.com by imo-m03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.4.) id l.b9.130ce806 (7402) for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:03:58 -0400 (EDT) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 From: G0MRF@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:03:58 EDT Subject: LF: Re: Carriers / TV QRM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 107 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: In a message dated 8/30/01 7:56:00 PM GMT Daylight Time, mike@boxernet.demon.co.uk writes: << My problem is, what do I replace it with. Has anyone recently installed a modern TV that does not cause QRM on 136 ? It would seem like "self mutilation" (Selbst-Verstuemmelung) to retain this equipment, particularly at present here in the UK with the awful junk generally being offered to us on tv. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated ! >> I have a Sony and a Panasonic 'portable'. Both of these are clear on 136k. David G0MRF