Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1647 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2004 00:43:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan02.plus.net) (212.159.14.236) by ptb-mailstore04.plus.net with SMTP; 27 Apr 2004 00:43:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 42908 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2004 00:43:50 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore02.plus.net (212.159.14.216) by ptb-mxscan02.plus.net with SMTP; 27 Apr 2004 00:43:49 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BIGhR-000B2i-9A for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 00:43:49 +0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BIGgt-0000uS-RD for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 01:43:15 +0100 Received: from [213.232.95.59] (helo=relay.salmark.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BIGgt-0000uJ-6o for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 01:43:15 +0100 Received: from salador.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.9]) by relay.salmark.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BIGgp-0004Q7-VW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 01:43:12 +0100 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (root@plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.151]) by salador.ucs.mun.ca (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i3R0fGEK025379 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 22:11:29 -0230 (NDT) (envelope-from jcraig@morgan.ucs.mun.ca) Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (jcraig@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by plato.ucs.mun.ca (8.12.3p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i3R0fGgj028086 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 22:11:16 -0230 (NDT) Received: (from jcraig@localhost) by plato.ucs.mun.ca (8.12.3p2/8.12.1/Submit) id i3R0fF6O003241; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 22:11:15 -0230 (NDT) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 22:11:15 -0230 (NDT) From: Joe Craig X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <001301c42be1$246ee5a0$40e486d4@erica> Message-ID: References: <742496369.20040423163034@t-online.de> <001301c42abf$a13bfdc0$437c7ad5@rogersservices> <001301c42be1$246ee5a0$40e486d4@erica> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA in 5WPM Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Peter and Jim and Group, Thanks for the reports and the very interesting comments. I have noticed on Brian's captures that there appears to be more noise centred around 137.777 kHz when the 5 WPM is being sent. Hopefully soon, I will have another few dB after some aerial or TX work. 73 Joe