Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wBCMEn3r024170
for <rlg@klubnl.pl>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 23:15:00 +0100
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1gXCfa-0006Y2-Fo
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:07:54 +0000
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1gXCeR-0006Xt-HW
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:06:43 +0000
Received: from esa02.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.136.22])
by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.91_59-0488984)
(envelope-from <jcraig@mun.ca>)
id 1gXCeN-0004uG-Cf
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:06:39 +0000
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2E8AAD+hBFc/5nomYZkHAEBAQQBAQc?=
=?us-ascii?q?EAQGBUgYBAQsBggOBNTMnhnSRNIFoJZdUgXoNKwGEQAKCfSI1CA0BAwEBAQE?=
=?us-ascii?q?BAQICAmkohT4BBAE4Ai0XCws0ElcZhRsIqDSJAIEsiXiCRBeBf4FEgUoXfoR?=
=?us-ascii?q?AgQ6FDgKVfosOCZFXGJFGmT+BSAM0gVaELIInF444JzCBBQEBjGsBAQ?=
X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2E8AAD+hBFc/5nomYZkHAEBAQQBAQcEAQGBUgYBAQsBg?=
=?us-ascii?q?gOBNTMnhnSRNIFoJZdUgXoNKwGEQAKCfSI1CA0BAwEBAQEBAQICAmkohT4BB?=
=?us-ascii?q?AE4Ai0XCws0ElcZhRsIqDSJAIEsiXiCRBeBf4FEgUoXfoRAgQ6FDgKVfosOC?=
=?us-ascii?q?ZFXGJFGmT+BSAM0gVaELIInF444JzCBBQEBjGsBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,346,1539657000";
d="scan'208";a="7390073"
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.153])
by smtp02.ucs.mun.ca with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 12 Dec 2018 18:36:35 -0430
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 18:36:34 -0330 (NST)
From: jcraig@mun.ca
X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
In-Reply-To: <5C115E70.7070406@posteo.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1812121833120.30921@plato.ucs.mun.ca>
References: <941104406.2050754.1544486244944.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
<941104406.2050754.1544486244944@mail.yahoo.com> <7CF7D632B96D471BA659A32CF876943B@Rob64PC>
<Pine.LNX.4.64.1812112122350.27131@plato.ucs.mun.ca> <5C10B6A4.4060500@posteo.de>
<5C10DB6B.6050100@posteo.de> <5C115E70.7070406@posteo.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
Content preview: Hi Stefan, Thank-you very much for this effort. It makes me
sad to say that the decode is incorrect... unless something was done wrong
on this end. Good luck with next try.
Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
X-Scan-Signature: 9d01e9df836df8dd3868645661e1c1f7
Subject: Re: LF: VLF EbNaut
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no
version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Hi Stefan,
Thank-you very much for this effort. It makes me sad to say
that the decode is incorrect... unless something was done wrong
on this end.
Good luck with next try.
Joe VO1NA
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, DK7FC wrote:
> Hello Joe,
>
> I tried to decode your message from the stream of Renato Remoro. The carrier
> S/N is quite thin but there were two decodes of the same message.
> Best result was:
> found rank 19764 ber 4.4515e-01 Eb/N0 1.2 M -4.933010787e-04 ph 31
> -120,-120,-90,-90 [3]
> carrier phase: -0.8 deg
> carrier Eb/N0: 1.0 dB
> carrier Es/N0: -20.36 dB
> carrier S/N: 8.58 dB in 42.5 uHz, -35.13 dB in 1Hz, -69.11 dB in 2.5kHz
>
> ...i.e. the message is '3'.
> There is nothing to loose so i tell you that result. Maybe it is wrong. I
> will try again tomorrow including stacking and see if there is another result
> with better SNR.
>
> 73, Stefan
>
> Am 12.12.2018 10:56, schrieb DK7FC:
>> Joe,
>>
>> However, i'm recording the VLF stream of Renato Romero since this morning
>> again. I will try to decode the message rom these recordings. It is a good
>> experiment for me to see if it works. So just continue TXing.
>>
>> 73, Stefan
>>
>> Am 12.12.2018 08:20, schrieb DK7FC:
>>> Hello Joe,
>>>
>>> Unfortunately my tree is shut down since a week due to lack of sun. After
>>> 3 years the lead acid batteries lost about 50 % of their capacity, so i
>>> have only 5 days coverage. A better battery system would be helpful but
>>> with these new permanent overcast winter days i would need something like
>>> 500 Ah it seems.
>>> I will try as soon as the tree is back...
>>>
>>> 73, Stefan
>>>
>>> Am 12.12.2018 01:54, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca:
>>>> A quick reminder:
>>>>
>>>> 8.2700075 kHz, one character, 30 s symbols, 784 symbols, 16K23A, CRC-21,
>>>> 2300 and 1100 ut daily 30 watts to a 100x15m RL
>>>>
>>>> 73
>>>> Joe VO1NA
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>