Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 10:39:45 -0330 (NST)
From: jcraig@mun.ca
To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
In-Reply-To: <f67b2d2b-9ee0-b394-b188-fbc7b42bb4db@n1bug.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1811081037320.1067@plato.ucs.mun.ca>
References: <f67b2d2b-9ee0-b394-b188-fbc7b42bb4db@n1bug.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: LF: New QRSS / DFCW grabbers
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Hi Paul.  Thank-you for reporting the CW sigs.  I look forward to
trying a 2 way this winter.

Your grabber is working -- at least it shows my carrier while it
is keyed.

73
Joe VO1NA

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018, N1BUG wrote:

> Hi LF artists,
>
> I invite you to try painting something on my new grabbers. I hope to
> have these running all the time, monitoring the EU and NA LF QRSS
> windows. The grabbers are located at my home station in FN55mf.
>
> Unfortunately there is some QRM from my own LF transmissions, but
> there is enough time between to see if your signal is making it
> here. Also, you can see 136.170 to 136.172 is not the best for me, I
> have some intermittent QRM there from motor speed controller(s) at
> the waste water treatment plant about 1.5 km from me.
>
> The NA window is a mess right now, but the interference is not
> always present there. I don't have any idea what is making all that
> stuff.
>
> I am still learning about Spectrum Lab. Probably there are more
> improvements that could be made. Suggestions are very welcome, but
> please remember I have no idea what I am doing. :)
>
> Both grabbers can be found here:
>
> http://n1bug.com/station/grabber/
>
> Good luck!
>
> 73,
> Paul N1BUG
>
>