Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wA40WL9l022636 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2018 01:32:28 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gJ6DK-0002wB-SW for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 00:24:26 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gJ6Ak-0002vD-W3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 00:21:46 +0000 Received: from esa08.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.136.28]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gJ6AZ-0005Ay-H5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 00:21:36 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2EMAQD5Od5b/5nomYZjHQEBBQEHBQG?= =?us-ascii?q?BVAUBCwGCBIFlmEyBaCWBeJcvDSsBhEACgz8iNwoNAQMBAQEBAQECAgJpKIU?= =?us-ascii?q?8AQQBOAItFwsLNBJXhTQIqHyIbIEsiTKCRBeCAIERM4FKgRWFS4UOAp8yCZE?= =?us-ascii?q?RGJBgl0aBWSOBVYQtkHEmgTUBAY0CAQE?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2EMAQD5Od5b/5nomYZjHQEBBQEHBQGBVAUBCwGCBIFlm?= =?us-ascii?q?EyBaCWBeJcvDSsBhEACgz8iNwoNAQMBAQEBAQECAgJpKIU8AQQBOAItFwsLN?= =?us-ascii?q?BJXhTQIqHyIbIEsiTKCRBeCAIERM4FKgRWFS4UOAp8yCZERGJBgl0aBWSOBV?= =?us-ascii?q?YQtkHEmgTUBAY0CAQE?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,462,1534818600"; d="scan'208";a="5993615" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.153]) by smtp08.ucs.mun.ca with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 03 Nov 2018 21:51:30 -0330 Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2018 21:51:29 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <5BDE0FA1.11163.2BDFF4D@roelof.ndb.demon.nl> Message-ID: References: <5BDD7474.5020705@posteo.de>, <5BDDCF8E.14759.1C3B3DD@roelof.ndb.demon.nl>, <5BDE0FA1.11163.2BDFF4D@roelof.ndb.demon.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Roelof, At 2335 the TX mode switch was moved from QRSS100 to 10 WPM CW on 136.5 kHz. Good luck to you and anyone else who might be listening. And I am envious of your copy of LT/305! [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: c1f72e5acb1277e013f90c915ad7ad68 Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Roelof, At 2335 the TX mode switch was moved from QRSS100 to 10 WPM CW on 136.5 kHz. Good luck to you and anyone else who might be listening. And I am envious of your copy of LT/305! 73 & TNX Joe On Sat, 3 Nov 2018, Roelof Bakker wrote: > Hello Joe, > > I just checked 137.777 and I can hear a weak carrier. > I will start my overnight recording right now. > > You can transmit anywhere you like, as I can analyse any channel between 100 and 600 kHz from > a linrad recording. > > With Linrad I can dig deep into the noise using single sideband CW reception in a 5 Hz > bandwidth. In term of WSPR this is 27 dB less noise compared with a 2500 Hz voice channel. > > 73, > Roelof, pa0rdt > >