Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w4LCdx3N000753 for ; Mon, 21 May 2018 14:40:02 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fKk1f-0007T5-IS for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 May 2018 13:34:55 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fKk1e-0007Sw-Pk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 May 2018 13:34:54 +0100 Received: from esa05.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.136.25]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1fKk1c-0004Nn-Rz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 May 2018 13:34:53 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2GPBAC1uwJb/5nomYZcHAEBAQQBAQo?= =?us-ascii?q?BAYNDgV4omGyBWCGBD1+UTwsrAYRAAoIYITcVAQIBAQEBAQECAgJoKIUqAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQIBOAItFwsLFQMcElcZhRsIqR2He0SCD4g1ghOBPoJdhE1yhQgCkRSHOAm?= =?us-ascii?q?OV4x9kHeBJTIjgVKEA5BnJjB6AQGMc4JFAQE?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2GPBAC1uwJb/5nomYZcHAEBAQQBAQoBAYNDgV4omGyBW?= =?us-ascii?q?CGBD1+UTwsrAYRAAoIYITcVAQIBAQEBAQECAgJoKIUqAQEBAQIBOAItFwsLF?= =?us-ascii?q?QMcElcZhRsIqR2He0SCD4g1ghOBPoJdhE1yhQgCkRSHOAmOV4x9kHeBJTIjg?= =?us-ascii?q?VKEA5BnJjB6AQGMc4JFAQE?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,426,1520908200"; d="scan'208";a="1543297" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.153]) by smtp05.ucs.mun.ca with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 21 May 2018 10:04:47 -0330 Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 10:04:34 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <5B02B1DB.7060503@posteo.de> Message-ID: References: <5B017AE8.3080103@posteo.de> <5B02B1DB.7060503@posteo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, Sorry, that's not it. The WX was wet last night and there was some arcing which probably didn't help. The WX will be dry so let's try again tonight and if that fails, we can try your settings. [...] Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals X-Scan-Signature: b8b011f938af8abc4b241335cabd0691 Subject: Re: LF: NA VLF Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Stefan, Sorry, that's not it. The WX was wet last night and there was some arcing which probably didn't help. The WX will be dry so let's try again tonight and if that fails, we can try your settings. Thanks for monitoring. 73 Joe On Mon, 21 May 2018, DK7FC wrote: > Hello Joe, > > I think i've got your message. But it is very weak, quite close to the limit. > The message is 'T', right? > > From: vtcat -T2018-05-20_23:00,+7h Joe1ch.vt | vtraw -oa | ./iqnorm2 | ebnaut > -dp16K23A -N1 -S30 -k21 -c4 -r1 -L534849 -PS -f9 -v > > i got as the best result: > phase 58 150 120 120 90 > found rank 223512 ber 4.4898e-01 Eb/N0 0.6 M -3.561031494e+02 ph 58 > 150,120,120,90 [T] > carrier phase: 17.6 deg > carrier Eb/N0: 0.2 dB > carrier Es/N0: -21.21 dB > carrier S/N: 7.73 dB in 42.5 uHz, -35.98 dB in 1Hz, -69.96 dB in 2.5kHz > > > 73, Stefan > > > Am 20.05.2018 17:33, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >> >> Hi Stefan and thank-you for the encouraging report. At the moment, all >> is set (I hope!) for: >> >> One character, 8.2700075 kHz, >> 2300, 1100 utc, 16K23A, CRC-21, >> 784 symbols, 30 seconds >> >> It will take some time to change to the settings you suggested -- we can >> try this after. >> >> 73 and tnx agn >> >> Joe >> >> On Sun, 20 May 2018, DK7FC wrote: >> >>> Hello Joe, >>> >>> I searched for your last nights carrier in my recordings and found an >>> impressive SNR, totally unexpected for this time in the year. See >>> attachment. >>> The carrier reaches 10.97 dB S/N in 39.7 uHz when starting at 23 UTC. This >>> would easily decode a 1 char message. >>> I remember we tried some weeks ago without success, even when stacking >>> several days or nights. >>> >>> Do we want to try again to detect a 1 char message? >>> Based on the last nights results i would suggest: 1 char, 16K21A, CRC26, >>> Start 23:00 UTC, 30 sec symbols >>> >>> HW? :-) >>> >>> 73, Stefan >>> >>> Am 18.05.2018 01:54, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >>>> >>>> Hello VLF >>>> >>>> The TX is QRV 8270.0075 Hz 10 uW ERP unmodulated carrier. >>>> >>>> 73 >>>> Joe VO1NA >>>> >>> >> > >