Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w1HG1fSt030475 for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 17:01:43 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1en4rC-0003oS-VP for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 15:56:58 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1en4rB-0003oD-6M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 15:56:57 +0000 Received: from simone.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1en4r8-00081V-4p for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 15:56:55 +0000 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by simone.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w1HFuoau000352 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 12:26:51 -0330 Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 12:26:50 -0330 (NST) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <5A8831FD.1050303@posteo.de> Message-ID: References: <52dea779-7aae-aff8-1072-ad24cdcd007c@freenet.de> <4024a3ab-eb61-7801-e9ad-5715c5f49546@abelian.org> <9a7cf91a-5643-9149-28a7-ce6d282db3e9@abelian.org> <1555f07a-f2a3-fb55-c246-f52442a1a723@freenet.de> <4ac6d43f-85c7-bd05-85b9-5b64ebcfbf35@abelian.org> <2f6a408a-af27-9c9b-b116-7becd9b1c66f@abelian.org> <6eced61e-a7ce-2935-195d-4a76f375b11e@freenet.de> <633c1982-97fe-7d9d-7f69-07e3503147bb@abelian.org> <5A88244B.1020304@posteo.de> <5A8831FD.1050303@posteo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: PS Paul's spectrograms give a more accurate and comprehensive indication of my aerial current than my sparse notes. I recall Jim's remarks about using Paul's measurements to calibrate the ammeter. Joe [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: f62c7cf8eeb8e5a327b71719e9bffff1 Subject: LF: VLF TA Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false PS Paul's spectrograms give a more accurate and comprehensive indication of my aerial current than my sparse notes. I recall Jim's remarks about using Paul's measurements to calibrate the ammeter. Joe On Sat, 17 Feb 2018, DK7FC wrote: > Hello Joe, > > Can you give us a short overview in which days the day and/or night message > was transmitted as announced? I would certainly give it a try. My tree has > been on air for > 1 week now and i think there is a good chance to get a > decode. > However mixing a file into the stack that contains no transmission makes > things much worse of course... > > 73, Stefan > > Am 17.02.2018 14:26, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >> Meanwhile on this side of the pond, the aerial is iced and the current is >> quite low since last night but the transmissions on 8.2700075 kHz continue. >> >> 73 >> Joe VO1NA > >