Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vB5Itlje025964 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 19:55:50 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eMIJw-0002dx-JW for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 18:51:56 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eMIJw-0002do-Bw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 18:51:56 +0000 Received: from simone.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eMIJt-0007tw-Fp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 18:51:55 +0000 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by simone.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id vB5Ipl4g018042 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 15:21:48 -0330 Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 15:21:47 -0330 (NST) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <5A269402.80902@posteo.de> Message-ID: References: <4d96a9d4-5f22-7650-872b-6344e9aea8e3@abelian.org> <00f901d36646$feda4e60$fc8eeb20$@comcast.net> <085dd850-9c10-16a0-70ef-fb2de079ffb8@abelian.org> <023201d367cf$8a5761b0$9f062510$@comcast.net> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB9AAAF572@servigilant.vigilant.local> <2166618d-7238-0516-367c-2f917532eed2@abelian.org> <5A20A4EC.4060009@posteo.de> <5A269402.80902@posteo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Tue, 5 Dec 2017, DK7FC wrote: > Hi Joe, > > Do you now measure the current by using SpecLab? And do you keep it constant > by using SpecLab? Not yet, but I have the .ini file and instructions you sent me. This can be tried tonight. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 87966b345956c8ef3389b993f6a18f4e Subject: Re: LF: RE: Todmorden receiver/VLF Speclab Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false On Tue, 5 Dec 2017, DK7FC wrote: > Hi Joe, > > Do you now measure the current by using SpecLab? And do you keep it constant > by using SpecLab? Not yet, but I have the .ini file and instructions you sent me. This can be tried tonight. > They predict 8 hours of sun on Thursday. That would mean 20 Ah for the tree > :-) A letter is in psk.txt, ready to send, but help might be needed setting up SL. > > 73, Stefan > > Joe