Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 08:45:35 -0330 (NST)
From: jcraig@mun.ca
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
In-Reply-To: <c0930471-a16b-48ea-ffcb-536ac6e4b9df@abelian.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1712050834560.21375@plato.ucs.mun.ca>
References: <4d96a9d4-5f22-7650-872b-6344e9aea8e3@abelian.org>
 <00f901d36646$feda4e60$fc8eeb20$@comcast.net> <085dd850-9c10-16a0-70ef-fb2de079ffb8@abelian.org>
 <023201d367cf$8a5761b0$9f062510$@comcast.net> <b22c25ae-1b76-f1bb-1e54-9ecc8143e7c8@abelian.org>
 <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB9AAAF572@servigilant.vigilant.local>
 <2166618d-7238-0516-367c-2f917532eed2@abelian.org> <5A20A4EC.4060009@posteo.de>
 <c0930471-a16b-48ea-ffcb-536ac6e4b9df@abelian.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: LF: RE: Todmorden receiver
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Thank-you for the update, Paul.  It't amazing that 10 uW can be detected
over there -  almost like spooky action at a distance, with only
a few hundred billion photons per second.

The carrier is phase stabilised by Spec Lab so the tuning coil can be
peaked without glitching the phase and the current is also periodically
adjusted to keep it about 0.25A.  Is it possible to see diurnal changes
in the phase?

The TX will be on for the weekend for Stefan's VLF party unless the
wx gets in the way.

73
Joe VO1NA

On Tue, 5 Dec 2017, Paul Nicholson wrote:

>
> New H-field rx is coming along well.  Design changes are
> completed - it has a lower system noise, wider bandwidth,
> significantly lower common mode response, and a much better
> line driver.  Like the new E-field rx, it also has a built-in
> calibration port.
>
> Currently testing the design changes on breadboard and it
> performs just as per the Spice model, except for a higher than
> expected system noise.   Should be just below 0.1fT in 1Hz
> but I'm measuring 0.46 fT.   Maybe this specimen of LT1028
> is a bit noisier than others?  It's my last one but I've
> got more arriving hopefully today.   I'll pick the best two.
> Even with this mysterious extra system noise, it's still 20dB
> below the natural noise floor after sferic blanking.
>
> Apart from that it is working perfectly, just as per design
> and looks very good at 137 kHz too.
>
> Hopefully will be able to start the cutting and drilling and
> filing and soldering this week.  That's my least favourite part
> of the job.
>
> What I won't discover until it's finished and installed, is
> whether it actually cures the excess noise at 8kHz and 5kHz
> that we've seen lately.  I haven't been able to identify the
> cause of the relatively (compared to E-field) poor S/N on the
> existing rx.  Hopefully it is a low level of intermod in the
> line driver.  If so the new rx will not suffer that problem
> and we'll see another step improvement in the 8270 spectrogram.
>
> --
> Paul Nicholson
> --
>
>