Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1169; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t06MivSZ012805 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 23:44:57 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Y8cmE-0008G9-O9 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 22:39:02 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Y8cmE-0008Fx-Gh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 22:39:02 +0000 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8cmC-0000k1-Jp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 22:39:01 +0000 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id t06McxOP006160 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 19:08:59 -0330 Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 19:08:59 -0330 (NST) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <54A87B31.1070506@gmx.de> Message-ID: References: <54A838C5.3080800@gmx.de> <54A87B31.1070506@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scan-Signature: e90dcb17768c7e768f13e0721cc1c0c7 Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1834 Hi Hartmut, This is most reassuring. Thanks and keep up the impressive RX work. 73 Joe VO1NA On Sun, 4 Jan 2015, Hartmut Wolff wrote: > Am 2015-01-03 um 20:55 schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >> And not so many side bands! My apologies to you Hartmut and >> others looking for signals amidst my key-clicks. > > Joe, > most the time DCF39 is the reason for the noise. When you are looking on the > grabber: 21:25-22:50UTC DCF39 was "hyperactive". There is some mixing between > your signal and the DCF39 sidebands. > > 73 > Hartmut > >