Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1170; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id sAEJlT5h027331 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 20:47:29 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1XpMlg-00014j-5J for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:42:52 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1XpMlf-00014W-TX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:42:51 +0000 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XpMld-0004nq-UP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:42:50 +0000 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id sAEJgl16032481 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:12:47 -0330 Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:12:47 -0330 (NST) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <1F3233E8840B47AFABC056750DD2C708@White> Message-ID: References: <2798AC58C0E648CFA0FB96187FCCD7CD@AGB>, , <546347EE.21682.650479@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> <1F3233E8840B47AFABC056750DD2C708@White> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scan-Signature: 3b8620872b19e25fb6f4dfaf1256edc3 Subject: Re: LF: OP8 on 478.477 kHz Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1175 Hi Markus, Thanks for this. I'll be watching tonight! 73 Joe On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Markus Vester wrote: > Also running both opds-8 and wspr-2 monitors tonight... > > DF6NM JN59NJ Opds-8 correlation 478.45 - 478.55 kHz > > 2014-11-14 01:11:56 VO1NA 4563km 478477.012Hz 6mHz -43.5dBOp 99% 16.0dB > 2014-11-14 01:04:04 G3XDV 843km 478540.184Hz 464mHz -32.0dBOp 98% 20.1dB > 2014-11-14 00:28:30 G3XDV 843km 478540.281Hz 532mHz -17.2dBOp 92% 20.0dB > 2014-11-14 00:06:22 G8HUH 1019km 478545.093Hz 19mHz -30.6dBOp 94% 20.3dB > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/opds.htm > > Best 73, > Markus (DF6NM) > > > From: Mike Dennison > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 12:43 PM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: OP8 on 478.477 kHz > > > Joe, > > If you want a frequency check, the OPDS systems of GW0EZY and SV8RV > are within 1Hz. See below: > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10326787/GW0EZY-opds8-477kHz.txt > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/j6384u1eopldiot/detected8.txt?dl=0 > > As Graham says, stability and frequency accuracy is unimportant for > Op, but if you want to take advantage of the extra few dB SNR of OPDS > receivers you will need to have high stability. > > 73 de Mike, G3XDV > ...