Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.203.68 with SMTP id ko4csp10171igc; Tue, 6 May 2014 05:27:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.89.40 with SMTP id bl8mr376569wjb.90.1399379222825; Tue, 06 May 2014 05:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id lb4si5610560wjc.73.2014.05.06.05.27.02 for ; Tue, 06 May 2014 05:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Whdxw-0006cm-4c for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 12:55:20 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Whdxv-0006cd-GE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 12:55:19 +0100 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1Whdxt-0006EP-7e for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 12:55:18 +0100 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id s46BtBH0013095 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 6 May 2014 09:25:13 -0230 Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 09:25:11 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <214CB6901F944AAB808748C0F08BF7DB@AGB> Message-ID: References: <56120696A8C7412ABCCD8F5AF4C77064@PCFIXE> <1399188247.96608.YahooMailNeo@web133001.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <214CB6901F944AAB808748C0F08BF7DB@AGB> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi G.. Yesterday, VE3QN at RAC had suggeted 1 kHz as a "fair guess" for B/W. Is the Group comfortable with this? Cheers Joe VO1NA [...] Content analysis details: (-1.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [134.153.232.76 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: a6b6ffaf48fdddf1ed5c25dc4bf03ee1 Subject: Re: LF: Canada's newest amateur band - 630m. (B/W) Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi G.. Yesterday, VE3QN at RAC had suggeted 1 kHz as a "fair guess" for B/W. Is the Group comfortable with this? Cheers Joe VO1NA On Sun, 4 May 2014, Graham wrote: > Better late than never Joe, just in time for the next dip in solar > activity as well ! > > No mention of modes and B/W in the sub clauses , other than the usual > 'no jam' ? > > 73, G, > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: > Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2014 10:11 AM > To: > Subject: LF: Canada's newest amateur band - 630m. > >> Hello Group, >> >> For those who didn't get the CW message on 477.7 kHz last night, I'm >> happy to report that 472-479 kHz is now available to all Canadian >> amateurs. Per the ITU WRC12 approval of 14 February 2012, we may >> use 5 watts EIRP on the band but may not cause interference to >> the primary users. For further info, please see the Industry Canada >> web page, http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/sf10759.html >> which was published online last Thursday 1 May. >> >> 73 >> Joe VO1NA >> >> > >