Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.203.68 with SMTP id ko4csp243004igc; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:28:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.73.1 with SMTP id h1mr19902548wiv.10.1395710912492; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:28:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p10si11314987wik.1.2014.03.24.18.28.31 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:28:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WSFRf-0000DN-IO for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 00:42:23 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WSFRf-0000DE-3f for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 00:42:23 +0000 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WSFRc-0007Jv-MC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 00:42:22 +0000 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id s2P0gHnY027743 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 22:12:17 -0230 Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 22:12:17 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <5330B405.9000404@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Message-ID: References: , <5330B405.9000404@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, It would be better for us all. I didn't note the time of the sunset today. I'll have to look it up or wait till tomorrow evening. Is 477.7 good for you? [...] Content analysis details: (-1.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [134.153.232.76 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 52d17ee6003fa6763aae891a69410baf Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA QRSS10 on 477.7 kHz Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-1719232024-1736683416-1395708137=:13440" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---1719232024-1736683416-1395708137=:13440 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Hi Stefan, It would be better for us all. I didn't note the time of the sunset today. I'll have to look it up or wait till tomorrow evening. Is 477.7 good for you? 73 Joe VO1NA On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: > Hello Joe, > > When is your local sunset in GN37 today? That would be the best time! > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Am 24.03.2014 23:23, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >> Hi Lubos, >>=20 >> Please do join in! >>=20 >> 73 >> Joe >>=20 >> On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, Lubos wrote: >>=20 >>> Hello Joe and Christian!I am going to be on 630m as well. My favourite = frq=20 >>> is 472.7kHz. Can I join you? >>> Lubos, OK2BVG, JN88KS >>> ***********************************************************************= ***=20 >>>=20 >>>> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:17:49 -0230 >>>> From: jcraig@mun.ca >>>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>>> Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA QRSS10 on 477.7 kHz >>>>=20 >>>> Hi Christian, >>>>=20 >>>> Yes, let's try for a real CW QSO tonight. Will call 0000 utc and >>>> on the half hours until 0200. Will listen 472.5 kHz if that's OK >>>> with you. >>>>=20 >>>> We are having a blizzard so experimentation with the antenna >>>> is out for today. The TX might be convinced to give another 3 dB. >>>> Let's hope that a fried FET is not in the future! >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> 73 >>>> Joe VO1NA >>>>=20 >>>> On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, C. Groeger wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> Hi Joe, >>>> Can you QRO a bit for a real CW QSO? >>>> You told me last time, you heard me and I heard you as well... >>>> 73, df5qg >>>>=20 >>>> Christian Groeger >>>>=20 >>>> jcraig@mun.ca schrieb: >>>>=20 >>>>> Many thanks for the reply to my calls. Your signals were also audibl= e=20 >>>>> at >>>>> times. BIA could be heard before our QSO and WD2SXH/7 was about 559= =20 >>>>> near >>>>> 476 kHz towards the end. Thank-you for staying up so late to make it= =20 >>>>> all >>>>> happen! TX here 50 watts, ERP about 1 watt. >>>>>=20 >>>>> 73 >>>>> Joe VO1NA >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, wolf_dl4yhf wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>> Hello Joe, >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Many thanks also... just now, at the 'final dit', your signal is=20 >>>>>> audible >>>>>> again: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> SNR in QRSS10 bandwidth (approx. 0.1 Hz) : over 30 dB ! >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> 73 and gn, >>>>>> Wolf DL4YHF >>>>>> JO42FD >>>>>> 100 W, inv. L with 60 meter total wire length, horizontal part appr= ox=20 >>>>>> 11 >>>>>> meters above ground. >>>>>> ..zzz.. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Am 22.03.2014 13:19, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Hello Wolf, >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Many thanks for the details of your reception. Sending audible sig= s=20 >>>>>>> to DL >>>>>>> was very gratifing. There is some room to improve the ERP >>>>>>> and I look forward to experimenting with this. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> 73 and thanks again >>>>>>> Joe >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Mar 2014, wolf_dl4yhf wrote: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Greetings all, >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Nice signal from Joe throughout the night, strongest around 04:00 = UTC >>>>>>>> here, but 'ever-present' between start and sunrise. >>>>>>>> Multi-strip spectrogram covering the strongest part (which was=20 >>>>>>>> audible >>>>>>>> during the peaks at 03:45 UTC): >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> http://www.qsl.net/dl4yhf/mf/VO1NA_2014_03_22__04UTC.jpg >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> The signal began to drop at 05:00 UTC, which is in the upper right= =20 >>>>>>>> corner >>>>>>>> of the screenshot. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Thanks for the test Joe. Hope to meet you in a QSO mode one day, f= or=20 >>>>>>>> me >>>>>>>> JT9-1 appears manageable... >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> 73, >>>>>>>> Wolf DL4YHF >>>>>>>> JO42RX >>>>>>>> RX: old IC-706 on 60 meter wire antenna resonated at 475 kHz, >>>>>>>> preselector/preamp *off* . >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 > > ---1719232024-1736683416-1395708137=:13440--