Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.101 with SMTP id vb5csp11118igc; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 09:22:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.187.237 with SMTP id fv13mr6091994wic.26.1394986961931; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 09:22:41 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id db6si3188883wib.25.2014.03.16.09.22.41 for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 09:22:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WPDVC-0000FE-1M for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 16:01:30 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WPDVB-0000F2-Lt for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 16:01:29 +0000 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WPDV9-00069S-VG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 16:01:28 +0000 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id s2GG1QuG030007 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 13:31:26 -0230 Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 13:31:26 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks Christian, The beacon was on last night but only 35 watts. It was 70 watts when you reported 229. 73 Joe [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [134.153.232.76 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 5f132ffce194fb93f2267a462d849f2b Subject: Re: LF: Beacon 477.7 kHz Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Thanks Christian, The beacon was on last night but only 35 watts. It was 70 watts when you reported 229. 73 Joe On Sun, 16 Mar 2014, C. Groeger wrote: > Joe, I tried to copy your sigs but nil! Was your beacon active? Maybe the qrg was not the best... I wonder if other stns hrd you? 73, df5qg Christian Groeger jcraig@mun.ca schrieb: >Hi Christian, > > Yes, again tonight. Your sigs were nil to 339 during your QSO with >Finbar. > >73 >Joe VO1NA > >On Sat, 15 Mar 2014, C. Groeger wrote: > >> Hi Joe, >Is your beacon also active on Sunday? >Was not qrv in the night but heard you recently in QSO with Finbar 229. >73, df5qg > >Christian Groeger > >jcraig@mun.ca schrieb: > >>Dear Group, >> >>12 WPM CW starting 0000 utc 15 March. >> >>Reports welcomed! >> >>73 >>Joe VO1NA >> >