Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.101 with SMTP id vb5csp10449igc; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 09:04:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.187.16 with SMTP id fo16mr6171385wic.26.1394985867527; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 09:04:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h10si3287777wiw.25.2014.03.16.09.04.27 for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 09:04:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WPDT4-0000BJ-2E for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:59:18 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WPDT3-0000BA-MJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:59:17 +0000 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WPDT1-00067c-Lc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:59:16 +0000 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id s2GFxCxF029907 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 13:29:12 -0230 Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 13:29:12 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Clemens, Thank-you for the report. We can hope for better conditions or more ERP. 73 Joe VO1NA [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [134.153.232.76 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: c0e6e8bcdc231effb9da2003d606d9a2 Subject: RE: LF: Beacon 477.7 kHz Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Clemens, Thank-you for the report. We can hope for better conditions or more ERP. 73 Joe VO1NA On Sun, 16 Mar 2014, Clemens Paul wrote: > >Maybe the qrg was not the best... >> I wonder if other stns hrd you? > > I've made a recording from 00.00UTC to 06.00UTC > Nil. > QRG was qrm-free. > At times there was only a carrier visible about 30Hz below 477.7kHz. > > 73 > Clemens > DL4RAJ > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of C. Groeger >> Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2014 11:43 AM >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Subject: Re: LF: Beacon 477.7 kHz >> >> Joe, >> I tried to copy your sigs but nil! >> Was your beacon active? >> Maybe the qrg was not the best... >> I wonder if other stns hrd you? >> 73, df5qg >> >> Christian Groeger >> >> jcraig@mun.ca schrieb: >> >>> Hi Christian, >>> >>> Yes, again tonight. Your sigs were nil to 339 during your QSO with >>> Finbar. >>> >>> 73 >>> Joe VO1NA >>> >>> On Sat, 15 Mar 2014, C. Groeger wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Joe, >>> Is your beacon also active on Sunday? >>> Was not qrv in the night but heard you recently in QSO with >> Finbar 229. >>> 73, df5qg >>> >>> Christian Groeger >>> >>> jcraig@mun.ca schrieb: >>> >>>> Dear Group, >>>> >>>> 12 WPM CW starting 0000 utc 15 March. >>>> >>>> Reports welcomed! >>>> >>>> 73 >>>> Joe VO1NA >>>> >>> >> > > >