Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp49380igc; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:26:12 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.23.201 with SMTP id o9mr3955496wjf.67.1392837971662; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:26:11 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gj10si2196797wib.86.2014.02.19.11.26.11 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:26:11 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WGCLz-0002Ny-MZ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:58:43 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WGCLz-0002Np-6D for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:58:43 +0000 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1WGCLw-0000qI-Uw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:58:42 +0000 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id s1JIwZCK003900 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 15:28:35 -0330 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 15:28:35 -0330 (NST) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <53032D5B.24540.280AFA@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com>, <5304A7DA.6000305@charter.net>,<001001cf2d76$301c5df0$6d01a8c0@DELL4>, MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Laurence, The 30 Hz shift of WWV on 10 MHz was interesting too. Here it's generally less than 2. The ionosphere must be dancing about madly! 73 Joe VO1NA [...] Content analysis details: (-1.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [134.153.232.76 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: cc2e5baae40f8f7a09b47e6877ef0bfb Subject: Re: LF: DCF39 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Laurence, The 30 Hz shift of WWV on 10 MHz was interesting too. Here it's generally less than 2. The ionosphere must be dancing about madly! 73 Joe VO1NA On Wed, 19 Feb 2014, Laurence KL7 L wrote: > Just to prove how really odd propagation is DCF39 138.830+ is some 20dB above "noise: at 1826Z in full daylight here over the NPole - a lot of "shot" iono noise on the HF bands at the moment - MUF 18MHz > Laurence KL7L >