Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp112911igc; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 04:27:42 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.14.37.66 with SMTP id x42mr9428724eea.83.1389356862309; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 04:27:42 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h45si6252116eev.175.2014.01.10.04.27.39 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 04:27:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1W1bAM-0004bY-T2 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:26:22 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1W1bAM-0004bP-Hv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:26:22 +0000 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1W1bAK-0007al-Kv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:26:21 +0000 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id s0ACQH8x005741 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:56:17 -0330 Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:56:17 -0330 (NST) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <52C711F7.2080905@gmx.de> Message-ID: References: ,<52C6EE6C.31591.1BEE17D@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> <52C711F7.2080905@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Hartmut and Group, Even with only 65 watts from the TX, strong QRSS100 signals were seen on Hartmut's grabber at 137.777 so the power was cut to <10 watts by reducing the drain voltage of the class E amp to 12 V. The grabber traces faded substantially, but rebounded to clearly readable around 0630 utc. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: cc2e5baae40f8f7a09b47e6877ef0bfb Subject: LF: Hartmut's Grabber -- QRP TA Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Hartmut and Group, Even with only 65 watts from the TX, strong QRSS100 signals were seen on Hartmut's grabber at 137.777 so the power was cut to <10 watts by reducing the drain voltage of the class E amp to 12 V. The grabber traces faded substantially, but rebounded to clearly readable around 0630 utc. Congrats on your impressive RX setup, Martmut! 73 Joe VO1NA