Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp7678igc; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 17:32:19 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.62.8 with SMTP id u8mr1294749wjr.68.1387071138247; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 17:32:18 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r4si2858541wjr.86.2013.12.14.17.32.17 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 17:32:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Vs0L3-0006Kt-NT for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 01:17:45 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Vs0L3-0006Kk-9U for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 01:17:45 +0000 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Vs0L0-0003fM-Nu for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 01:17:44 +0000 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id rBF1HfdZ022726 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 21:47:41 -0330 Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 21:47:41 -0330 (NST) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <52AD0174.3040507@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Message-ID: References: <52AD0174.3040507@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, saw sigs on the grabber and heard stuff on 472. Will keep at it on cw and go back to qrss3 QSX 476.17 at 0130. GL Joe On Sun, 15 Dec 2013, Stefan Schäfer wrote: [...] Content analysis details: (-0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: eeb98d9e5f7535b37e24952fd7f85252 Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-1719232024-742819746-1387070261=:14305" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3198 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---1719232024-742819746-1387070261=:14305 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Hi Stefan, saw sigs on the grabber and heard stuff on 472. Will keep at it on cw and go back to qrss3 QSX 476.17 at 0130. GL Joe On Sun, 15 Dec 2013, Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer wrote: > Joe, > > Now i'm calling CQ in CW on 472.2 kHz. Can you hear me? Ready for another= try=20 > in CW or QRSS-3? > > 73, Stefan > > > Am 14.12.2013 13:08, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >> Hi Christian, >>=20 >> Nothing heard last night unfortunately. >> You'll have to visit the shack to see my grabber as >> there is no internet. Will be QRV again tonight. >> OOOO QRSS3 and 0100 CW. >>=20 >> 73 >> Joe >>=20 >> On Sat, 14 Dec 2013, C. Groeger wrote: >>=20 >>> Hi Joe, >> Will send some cq on 472.1 just now. >> Maybe you will hear? >> Where can I find your grabber? >> 73, df5qg >>=20 >> Christian Groeger >>=20 >> jcraig@mun.ca schrieb: >>=20 >>> Hi Stefan, >>>=20 >>> Just started qrss3 beacon which will run to 0200 when the telegram >>> starts per schedule. Will watch your grabber and mine! >>>=20 >>> 73 >>> Joe >>>=20 >>> On Sat, 14 Dec 2013, Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Hi Joe, >>>>=20 >>>> I'm stopping my beacon and watch for you the whole time. Maybe you wil= l=20 >>>> appear in the QSB, so we can get a first impression over that path. Co= uld=20 >>>> you run it a few times longer? As soon as i can read you, i will attem= pt=20 >>>> a QSO. >>>>=20 >>>> 73, Stefan >>>>=20 >>>> Am 14.12.2013 02:20, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >>>>> Hi Stefan, >>>>> Been calling you on qrss3 but no reply. Your sigs were variable so I >>>>> doubt the path is good at the moment. The exciter is not frequency= =20 >>>>> agile >>>>> yet -- sorry. This will be a project soon. We can try again tomorr= ow. >>>>> QRSS at 0000-0100. >>>>>=20 >>>>> 73 and thanks >>>>> Joe >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Sat, 14 Dec 2013, Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>> Hi Joe, >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> I just found the latest spot in the 630m DX cluster. You are already= =20 >>>>>> QRV? Can we make a sked please? >>>>>> Can you listen on 472.2 kHz? Or suggest another frequency. I will tr= y=20 >>>>>> to listen for you. Or, send some QRSS-3 on 476.180 or so. My grabber= is=20 >>>>>> running at=20 >>>>>> http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_MF_Grabber.html >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> PS: There is local QRM on 477.7 here, at least for CW this is not od= eal=20 >>>>>> for me... >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Am 10.12.2013 20:40, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >>>>>>> Hi Stefan, >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> The band is fairly clear. Only a few carriers and WD2XSH stations >>>>>>> were heard so far; there is no preferred frequency so just let me k= now >>>>>>> where you will be. 476.17 is fine but there is a carrier 10 Hz bel= ow >>>>>>> that. I share your doubt we will be able to do CW because my ERP i= s >>>>>>> only about 1.5 watts, but we can certainly try. The plan is to run >>>>>>> the CW beacon while there is no CW and QRSS QSO activity, ie: 0300 >>>>>>> to 2300 UTC for the 14 and 15th. The TX QRG is 477.70 kHz. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> 73 >>>>>>> Joe >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 > > ---1719232024-742819746-1387070261=:14305--