Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp559592igb; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:16:42 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.126.9 with SMTP id mu9mr5247106wib.14.1386987401029; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:16:41 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ek7si462437wic.60.2013.12.13.18.16.40 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:16:41 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Vrdu8-0007fe-Bc for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 01:20:28 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Vrdu7-0007fV-VK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 01:20:27 +0000 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Vrdu5-0004eG-L9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 01:20:26 +0000 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id rBE1KM8s017371 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 21:50:22 -0330 Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 21:50:22 -0330 (NST) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <52ABAC38.1080901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Message-ID: References: ,<8D0C31F8DA1EC8D-9A4-2C1C@webmail-vd013.sysops.aol.com> <52A60989.5070402@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <52A63084.20006@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <52A765CE.8060000@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <52ABAC38.1080901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, Been calling you on qrss3 but no reply. Your sigs were variable so I doubt the path is good at the moment. The exciter is not frequency agile yet -- sorry. This will be a project soon. We can try again tomorrow. QRSS at 0000-0100. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: ce0e5a4ae990e5a63db3ab7aea21191b Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-1719232024-550912063-1386984022=:10773" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3195 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---1719232024-550912063-1386984022=:10773 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Hi Stefan, Been calling you on qrss3 but no reply. Your sigs were variable so I doubt the path is good at the moment. The exciter is not frequency agile yet -- sorry. This will be a project soon. We can try again tomorrow. QRSS at 0000-0100. 73 and thanks Joe On Sat, 14 Dec 2013, Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer wrote: > Hi Joe, > > I just found the latest spot in the 630m DX cluster. You are already QRV?= Can=20 > we make a sked please? > Can you listen on 472.2 kHz? Or suggest another frequency. I will try to= =20 > listen for you. Or, send some QRSS-3 on 476.180 or so. My grabber is runn= ing=20 > at http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_MF_Grabber.html > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > PS: There is local QRM on 477.7 here, at least for CW this is not odeal f= or=20 > me... > > > Am 10.12.2013 20:40, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >> Hi Stefan, >>=20 >> The band is fairly clear. Only a few carriers and WD2XSH stations >> were heard so far; there is no preferred frequency so just let me know >> where you will be. 476.17 is fine but there is a carrier 10 Hz below >> that. I share your doubt we will be able to do CW because my ERP is >> only about 1.5 watts, but we can certainly try. The plan is to run >> the CW beacon while there is no CW and QRSS QSO activity, ie: 0300 >> to 2300 UTC for the 14 and 15th. The TX QRG is 477.70 kHz. >>=20 >> 73 >> Joe >>=20 > > ---1719232024-550912063-1386984022=:10773--