Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp149406igb; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 05:17:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.109.68 with SMTP id hq4mr13454667wjb.12.1382357840952; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 05:17:20 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cs3si4558060wjc.60.2013.10.21.05.17.20 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 05:17:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VYDiB-0006cd-HW for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:31:51 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VYDiB-0006cU-67 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:31:51 +0100 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VYDi9-0004xL-3G for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:31:50 +0100 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r9LBVjIe012192 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:01:45 -0230 Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:01:45 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MUN-Disclaimer: http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/elect_communications_disclaimer_2012.php X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Bob, A few weak traces were captured, but they were very weak. It seems as if the RX sensitivity has been refuced by the tinkering with the stability, perhaps by some spurs from the 125 MHz oscillator in the xtal oven. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 1f795a2ee1ecd56682b47ad11969b3d3 Subject: Re: LF: 74.5493 instead... Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1983 Hi Bob, A few weak traces were captured, but they were very weak. It seems as if the RX sensitivity has been refuced by the tinkering with the stability, perhaps by some spurs from the 125 MHz oscillator in the xtal oven. Looking forward to trying again tonight if you are going to be on. 73 and thanks for the signal. Joe VO1NA On Sun, 20 Oct 2013, Bob Raide wrote: > WG2XRS/4-dropped down .2 Hz[ to avoid a nasty looking spur on Laurence's grabber-hope it stays put [spur and my signal]! Bob This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php