Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com
Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp112481pad;
Sun, 6 Oct 2013 16:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.180.211.171 with SMTP id nd11mr16480723wic.0.1381101236758;
Sun, 06 Oct 2013 16:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ev9si6965820wib.74.1969.12.31.16.00.00;
Sun, 06 Oct 2013 16:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1VSx3A-0002GI-GF
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2013 23:43:44 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1VSx39-0002G9-VL
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2013 23:43:43 +0100
Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76])
by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.77)
(envelope-from <jcraig@mun.ca>)
id 1VSx37-0004Qe-9D
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2013 23:43:42 +0100
Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153])
by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r96MhcDY031015
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Sun, 6 Oct 2013 20:13:38 -0230
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 20:13:38 -0230 (NDT)
From: jcraig@mun.ca
X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
In-Reply-To: <904B5525F51F4A5B8D4BBFA65752509E@AGB>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1310062006120.4862@plato.ucs.mun.ca>
References: <1380912236.760684954@f107.i.mail.ru> <1380913216.53884785@f27.i.mail.ru>
<Pine.LNX.4.64.1310050956140.1014@plato.ucs.mun.ca> <904B5525F51F4A5B8D4BBFA65752509E@AGB>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MUN-Disclaimer: http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/elect_communications_disclaimer_2012.php
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Hi Graham, We can always hope, but it took a long time to
get 137 so I doubt we'll see anything this season. Oh well -- its back to
the opera and more fun on 137 in the mean time. 73 Joe VO1NA [...]
Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
X-Scan-Signature: 1708620d3ce65bee0beaaede7929769a
Subject: Re: LF: Update on 630m in Canada
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no
version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 3109
Hi Graham,
We can always hope, but it took a long time to get 137 so I doubt
we'll see anything this season. Oh well -- its back to the opera
and more fun on 137 in the mean time.
73
Joe VO1NA
On Sat, 5 Oct 2013, Graham wrote:
> That's unfortunate Joe , may be not in time for this season ?
>
> 73 -G,
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: <jcraig@mun.ca>
> Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 1:27 PM
> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> Subject: LF: Update on 630m in Canada
>
>> On Thursday, Industry Canada posted the comments received regarding the
>> proposal to grant 472-479 kHz to amateurs. All comments were favourable
>> but one from a plc proponent. The negative submission was substantiated
>> largely by dramatisation, conjecture and outright inaccuracies and cited
>> the unfortunate FCC decision to deny 137 kHz to our American peers.
>>
>> We can hope that reason will prevail and that the new band will soon
>> become available to Canadian amateurs.
>>
>> 73
>> Joe VO1NA
>>
>>
>> This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at
>> http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php
>>
>
>
This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at
http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php