Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.1.100 with SMTP id 4csp22221igl; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 03:02:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.26.2 with SMTP id h2mr17167035lag.52.1373536924634; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 03:02:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r4si13757518lbw.148.2013.07.11.03.02.03 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 03:02:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UxDfu-0001Mt-37 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:00:34 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UxDft-0001Mk-NQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:00:33 +0100 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UxDfr-0000Fe-5w for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:00:32 +0100 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r6BA0RKa025272 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 07:30:27 -0230 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 07:30:27 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <000601ce7e05$e835f6b0$b8a1e410$@com> Message-ID: References: <51D975FA.60008@virginbroadband.com.au> <51DD1434.2030300@virginbroadband.com.au> <20130710173020.GA22574@cs.utwente.nl> <51DDADB2.5090905@aol.com> <51DDC00E.1000401@aol.com> <000601ce7e05$e835f6b0$b8a1e410$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MUN-Disclaimer: http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/elect_communications_disclaimer_2012.php X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Terry, Thank-you for the info and no I have not been getting the other reports. It seems I forgot the URL and the silly operating system seems unwilling to remind me what it is. Could you refresh my memory? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.3 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 5c335215f1b3de26d890ee84d49616ce Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA OP32 reports Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3223 Hi Terry, Thank-you for the info and no I have not been getting the other reports. It seems I forgot the URL and the silly operating system seems unwilling to remind me what it is. Could you refresh my memory? Many thanks and 73 Joe On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, Terry GW0EZY wrote: > "On a more practical theme, Op32 on 137.555 kHz 3 amps of RF from a pair of > Decca modules to a monopole starting soon. Reports most welcomed, and > gratitude to DF6NM for his opds reports online. > > 73 > Joe VO1NA" > > Joe - Just to check from your comment above. I realise Marcus has to post > his opds reports differently but are you getting "normal" OP32 reports > through the web reporting systems? I'm getting regular decodes from you each > night but thought it wasn't necessary to re-post them here. Although it's > useful for me to see your decodes they're only half useful if you don't!!! > > 73 Terry GW0EZY > > > > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php