Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 72A7A380000A2; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 19:08:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UshQO-0007G4-Er for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 23:45:52 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UshQO-0007Fv-3R for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 23:45:52 +0100 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UshQL-0000qr-Sp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 23:45:51 +0100 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r5SMjijf001009 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 20:15:47 -0230 Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 20:15:44 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <51CD86E7.7414.B3CCDE@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> Message-ID: References: <003d01ce71b1$fc0c55e0$f42501a0$@comcast.net>, , <51CD86E7.7414.B3CCDE@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MUN-Disclaimer: http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/elect_communications_disclaimer_2012.php X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Markus and Mike, Thank-you for the reports and the favourable comments on my photons. I hope to try some antenna comparisons soon. Thanks for reminding me that the dB values are S/N, Mike. Perhaps an ensemble of measurements can be used to get a mean value of noise. It is still quite light at the moment (2245) utc and the TX has just about start OP32 again. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.3 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 4d4a9e8f68fb15c54898568240f542c5 Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA Op32 137.555 kHz Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408151ce1765578c X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Markus and Mike, Thank-you for the reports and the favourable comments on my photons. I hope to try some antenna comparisons soon. Thanks for reminding me that the dB values are S/N, Mike. Perhaps an ensemble of measurements can be used to get a mean value of noise. It is still quite light at the moment (2245) utc and the TX has just about start OP32 again. 73 Joe This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php