Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 38FC538000088; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 07:39:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UnSJf-0000Z1-2W for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:37:15 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UnSJe-0000Ys-E4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:37:14 +0100 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UnSJc-0004Pt-5E for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:37:13 +0100 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r5EBb5k4031269 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:07:07 -0230 Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:07:05 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <775C41EC96B5427F83A0C5BC6186B8E2@White> Message-ID: References: <775C41EC96B5427F83A0C5BC6186B8E2@White> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MUN-Disclaimer: http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/elect_communications_disclaimer_2012.php X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Markus, Thank-you for the good news and the high resolution service. The keying sidebands are quite clear on your spectra. Tracking the 2.8 mHz offset has been challenging. It seems to be due to a rounding error. Your grabber is a convenient way to monitor progress towards correcting this. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.3 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: c1f72e5acb1277e013f90c915ad7ad68 Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608951bb00d4190a X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Markus, Thank-you for the good news and the high resolution service. The keying sidebands are quite clear on your spectra. Tracking the 2.8 mHz offset has been challenging. It seems to be due to a rounding error. Your grabber is a convenient way to monitor progress towards correcting this. I believe the phase incoherence of the previous exciter was caused by gating the oscillator before the divider stage. 73 Joe VO1NA On Fri, 14 Jun 2013, Markus Vester wrote: > Joe, > > good coherent traces from VO1NA have been visible here through the last six nights. The close-in spectrogram looks just perfect, with textbook-style symmetrical modulation sidebands at +- 16.67 milliHz > http://www.mydarc.de/df6nm/grabber/TAnarrow.jpg > > Best 73, > Markus > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php