Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8D3423800009C; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 06:16:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UkXD9-0008Kz-Ta for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:14:27 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UkXD9-0008Kp-52 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:14:27 +0100 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UkXD6-00037d-CK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:14:26 +0100 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r56AEKDb017440 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 07:44:21 -0230 Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 07:44:20 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <006801ce6251$bbd6c290$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> Message-ID: References: <51AA488C.4020800@eastlink.ca> <9F4D930ED1F64F7C974C9F3570FE5DEA@White> <106509721.20130603101147@mterrier.net> <511259661.20130605104210@mterrier.net> <22F50727DAB943178CABF2FE9A731025@GaryAsus> <89A40DBD5FD24F7DAF1DC48FF71ABC37@White> <006801ce6251$bbd6c290$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MUN-Disclaimer: http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/elect_communications_disclaimer_2012.php X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks Jay. I cant always see the sigs on your grabber and think perhaps the aerial does not radiate as well to the west. 73 Joe [...] Content analysis details: (-0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 17343f7e400f1005b5081acbd4115359 Subject: Re: LF: 137.7770 kHz Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404d51b0619076ae X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Thanks Jay. I cant always see the sigs on your grabber and think perhaps the aerial does not radiate as well to the west. 73 Joe On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, jrusgrove@comcast.net wrote: > Joe > > A look from closer in ... http://www.w1vd.com/grabber.html . > > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: > To: > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 7:34 PM > Subject: Re: LF: 137.7770 kHz > > >> Hi Stefan, Markus and Jean Pierre F1AFJ (Grabber service), >> >> Thanks for the report, Stefan. I am happy you have something nice to >> say about my sigs. Its good that they are reaching you when we are so >> close to the solstice. >> >> They were also quite strong around that time on Jean Pierre's grabber as >> well. >> >> As for Markus, he provided what I asked for -- and now I must say his >> very critical report is most gratefully received. :-) The problem seems to >> have disappeared after the 10 MHz input to the AD9851 was boosted with >> a BJT amp. The original interface simply offset the 1.5 V p/p >> to 2.5V DC; the new one bosted it to 0-3V which is more in line with >> the specs for the DDS. Perhaps the chirps and phase glitches were >> due to RF interfering with the weak 10 MHz input. >> >> I will be happy to try OP32 on another frequency soon. >> >> Thank-you very much for the good news and thanks all around. >> The TX is now again QRV on QRSS30. (2330 UTC) >> >> 73 >> Joe >> >> >> On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, Markus Vester wrote: >> >>> Joe, >>> >>> ok, then here comes a particularly un-welcomed report ;-) >>> >>> The problem seems to be solved, and this morning your trace appeared >>> perfectly focused in the narrow spectrogram. The frequency is 137777.0028, >>> give or take a couple of 100 uHz. How did you fix it? >>> >>> Would you like to try Op-32 again one of these days, preferably between >>> 137.5 and 137.6 kHz? >>> >>> Best 73, >>> Markus (DF6NM) >>> >>> >>> From: jcraig@mun.ca >>> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 8:36 PM >>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>> Subject: Re: LF: 137.7770 kHz >>> >>> >>> Hi Gary, >>> >>> Thank-you for the report, caputure and for running your FB grabber. >>> I look for sigs on your grabber quite frequently to check the TX. >>> >>> The TX will be on again tonight, (without chirps I hope). Comments >>> about the phase (especially unfavourable criticism) are solicited and >>> shall be most welcomed. >>> >>> 450 watts, 3.2 amps to a 100m wire at 15m. QRSS30. >>> >>> 73 >>> Joe VO1NA >>> ... >> >> This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at >> http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php >> > > > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php