Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mj06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AA9AF380000C2; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 14:38:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UkIZU-0005rw-8r for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 19:36:32 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UkIZT-0005rn-SC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 19:36:31 +0100 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UkIZR-0000Ru-Jw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 19:36:30 +0100 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r55IaQde014837 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 16:06:26 -0230 Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 16:06:26 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <22F50727DAB943178CABF2FE9A731025@GaryAsus> Message-ID: References: <51AA488C.4020800@eastlink.ca> <9F4D930ED1F64F7C974C9F3570FE5DEA@White> <106509721.20130603101147@mterrier.net> <511259661.20130605104210@mterrier.net> <22F50727DAB943178CABF2FE9A731025@GaryAsus> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MUN-Disclaimer: http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/elect_communications_disclaimer_2012.php X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Gary, Thank-you for the report, caputure and for running your FB grabber. I look for sigs on your grabber quite frequently to check the TX. The TX will be on again tonight, (without chirps I hope). Comments about the phase (especially unfavourable criticism) are solicited and shall be most welcomed. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: c9c533f07c530c146486ecf89a00ebb1 Subject: Re: LF: 137.7770 kHz Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b9a51af85aa5a9f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Gary, Thank-you for the report, caputure and for running your FB grabber. I look for sigs on your grabber quite frequently to check the TX. The TX will be on again tonight, (without chirps I hope). Comments about the phase (especially unfavourable criticism) are solicited and shall be most welcomed. 450 watts, 3.2 amps to a 100m wire at 15m. QRSS30. 73 Joe VO1NA On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, Gary - G4WGT wrote: > Hi Joe, > > Michel's excellent capture of your signal prompted me to check my over-night > grabber saves & found your signal showing up for a long period of time from > 00:50utc to about 03.30utc on my QRS03 grabber, see attached at 01:40utc. A > letter "V" seen at the top of image. > > 73, > > Gary - G4WGT. > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: > To: > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 1:02 PM > Subject: Re: LF: 137.7770 kHz > > >> Thank-you, Michel. >> >> Good conditions and no mention of a chip, nor could I see one >> on your spectrum. Yesterday I changed the TX and hopefully >> fixed the chirp and maybe the phase glitches? >> >> There are still bumps (~0.1 Hz) in the spectrum 10 MHz DOCXO output >> every few minutes. They last longer when the osc is less thermally >> insulated from the shack, but this is unchanged by putting >> a big cap across Vcc (which is unchanging). Could this be the source of the >> phase instability in the 137 kHz sigs? How about a large AC ripple on the >> supply to the PA? >> >> 73 & tnx >> Joe >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, Michel Brunel wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Good conditions tonight, >>> >>> 73, Michel - f5wk >> >> This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at >> http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php >> >> > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php