Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-di01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D773B38000082; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:51:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TdBFW-0004Vy-7M for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 02:50:14 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TdBFV-0004Vp-Oc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 02:50:13 +0000 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TdBFS-0004Be-GQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 02:50:12 +0000 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id qAR2nlCG007636 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:19:47 -0330 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:19:47 -0330 (NST) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <003501cdcc31$fb4db4d0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <8CF9A4B16AB3492-23FC-1D773@webmail-m007.sysops.aol.com> <000b01cdcc35$e2e62900$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <50B40DC2.2000006@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MUN-Disclaimer: http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/elect_communications_disclaimer_2012.php X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Sorry Markus, I misquoted your 24 Nov posting wherein you said NA was 137776.9 Hz. Thank-you for this reading and your advice on coherence. Thanks also to Stefan for his sggestions on what could be causing the incoherence. I'll try running the driver with an isolated power supply. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 1708620d3ce65bee0beaaede7929769a Subject: Re: xxSPAMxx Re: LF: Re: Loran-C active from Wildwood Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1da60550b42ab43201 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Sorry Markus, I misquoted your 24 Nov posting wherein you said NA was 137776.9 Hz. Thank-you for this reading and your advice on coherence. Thanks also to Stefan for his sggestions on what could be causing the incoherence. I'll try running the driver with an isolated power supply. There is still a loran signal audible though not very strong. 73 Joe VO1NA On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, jcraig@mun.ca wrote: > I just had a listen, heard the clatter, and set up for a calibration; > Markus reported my QRG as being 0.04 Hz low and I had been all excited > about correcting it against the lines he posted until NJ went QRT. > > Oh well... > > Joe > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Dexter McIntyre W4DEX wrote: > >> jrusgrove@comcast.net wrote: >>> Nice stairstep ... http://www.w1vd.com/grabber.html . >>> >> I just missed the old familiar loran calibration lines but the stairs do >> look nice. >> >> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/15095569/w4dex/grabber1_00000.jpg >> >> Dex >> >> > > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at > http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php > > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php