Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id EEC0538000098; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:29:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1T6tYh-0007ZT-Tw for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 02:28:35 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1T6tYh-0007ZK-Ca for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 02:28:35 +0100 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T6tYf-0000ob-Dp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 02:28:34 +0100 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q7U1SUqC001050 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:58:30 -0230 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:58:30 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <503EBD60.9010904@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Message-ID: References: <503EA92F.2000306@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <503EBD60.9010904@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MUN-Disclaimer: http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/elect_communications_disclaimer_2012.php X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, Group, Yes, there was a problem with the shift. It should be OK now. Thanks for letting me know. Hopfully enough 2200m photons will reach YV7MAE to leave a trace on his screen! [...] Content analysis details: (-0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 6ffbd2c9950b634d6cc91f9565b01a8b Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4118503ec2041249 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Stefan, Group, Yes, there was a problem with the shift. It should be OK now. Thanks for letting me know. Hopfully enough 2200m photons will reach YV7MAE to leave a trace on=20 his screen! 73 Joe On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: > > Am 30.08.2012 02:26, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >> Thanks Stefan, >>=20 >> TX on DFCW 75 as of 0024 UTC. > > Your signal as seen here a few minutes ago. Was the dip in the dit of A f= rom=20 > you or me? :-) > FYI your DFCW shift is not as usual. > >> Opera would only send one transmission despite being in beacon mode!!?? > Looks like that, yes. The beacon switch only enables the repeat function.= =20 > Otherwise it is a 1x beacon ;-) > > 73, Stefan > PS: We're watching for you in SA! > >> 73 >> Joe >>=20 > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php