Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
by mtain-dl04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A570638000096;
Fri, 6 Jul 2012 19:34:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1SnI1G-0000Jc-SI
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 00:33:02 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1SnI1G-0000JT-GO
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 00:33:02 +0100
Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76])
by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.77)
(envelope-from <jcraig@mun.ca>)
id 1SnI1E-0005y2-AU
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 00:33:01 +0100
Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153])
by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q66NWuhB011333
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 21:02:56 -0230
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 21:02:56 -0230 (NDT)
From: jcraig@mun.ca
X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
In-Reply-To: <4FF766E9.6020603@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1207062055070.25238@plato.ucs.mun.ca>
References: <4FF766E9.6020603@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MUN-Disclaimer: http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/elect_communications_disclaimer_2012.php
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Hi Stefan, Thank-you for the kind request. Unfortunately,
after a asking for an ammendment of the VX9MRC licence include 60 metres,
the 600 metre frequencies were removed. Requests to have 504-409 kHz reinstated
have not yet been replied, but I will certainly keep you posted on any new
developments. [...]
Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
X-Scan-Signature: 7001055fa59a9c23b9831ea6d317a074
Subject: Re: LF: VX9MRC ??
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no
version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:502557984:93952408
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad24ff77601174d
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none
Hi Stefan,
Thank-you for the kind request. Unfortunately, after a asking for
an ammendment of the VX9MRC licence include 60 metres, the 600 metre
frequencies were removed. Requests to have 504-409 kHz reinstated have
not yet been replied, but I will certainly keep you posted on any
new developments.
Sorry about this!
73
Joe VO1NA
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote:
> Hello Joe/VO1NA,
>
> Would you like to try with me tonite on MF in CW? We could give it a firs=
t=20
> try. I have NO idea if this is realistic in summer at all but it will be =
most=20
> exciting. I never listened for you so far. You're fixed on 507.777 right?
> What could be the best time?
>
> Vy 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>
>
This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at
http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php