Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0BD66380000DE; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 16:01:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Scisd-0004eo-Hg for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:00:27 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Scisc-0004eZ-Qz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:00:26 +0100 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Scisa-00042u-LN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:00:25 +0100 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q57K0NON010496 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 17:30:23 -0230 Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 17:30:23 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <4FD08634.8010402@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Message-ID: References: <00ad01cd424c$0138a690$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <00d301cd4255$b6428ac0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <636F5742-6949-4616-9CFD-3FCF99B4506A@gmail.com> <00f301cd4263$4ce62880$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4FCCD78A.6030302@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FD08634.8010402@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MUN-Disclaimer: http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/elect_communications_disclaimer_2012.php X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, I look forward to getting on 472-479 and having a QSO with your station on CW. 73 and tnx Joe [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 66d07794ca19cd68f7d6cc289cd4ac18 Subject: Re: LF: VX9MRC 504.1 kHz Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:447109312:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410b4fd1088975de X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Stefan, I look forward to getting on 472-479 and having a QSO with your station on CW. 73 and tnx Joe On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: > Hi Joe, LF, > > Yes, we're here of course :-) > Unfortunately i still cannot receive on MF. My RX is home made and vy nar= row=20 > band. But i'm going to have a suitable RX in some time. > BTW, what about all the 500 kHz allocations. What happens to them when th= e=20 > new 475 kHz band becomes permitted? Will you have an extended frequency r= ange=20 > then or will you have to QSY? > And what about the chances of this band? How easy is a TA detection? Woul= d it=20 > be possible to have a CW QSO over that 4400 km distance? > It would be possible for me to radiate 1 kW ERP on that band, however wit= h a=20 > 1W (EIRP of course) limitation, this may become a problem... > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > Am 07.06.2012 02:15, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >>=20 >> Hopefully someone will read this on Baa Baa.... >>=20 >> The beacon is running on a new frequency with a CW ID and >> a 10 second carrier. Reports most welcomed. >>=20 >> 73 >> Joe VO1NA >>=20 >> This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at >> http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.= php=20 > > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php