Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5E93D3804718B; Tue, 8 May 2012 18:50:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SRtDq-0004SX-K1 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 23:49:34 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SRtDq-0004SO-6E for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 23:49:34 +0100 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SRtDn-00038n-Kk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 23:49:33 +0100 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q48MnSrA009575 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 8 May 2012 20:19:28 -0230 Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 20:19:28 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org cc: "YV7MAE Maritn A. Echazarreta D." In-Reply-To: <4FA914CF.9000005@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Message-ID: References: <4FA50263.60800@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FA50506.8020108@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <34D85CC545AF41C0A2E711E1199477F5@White> <4FA71E6C.8030309@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FA780BD.30507@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FA8DC60.6010002@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FA90708.2030008@charter.net> <4FA90D83.8050704@gmail.com> <4FA914CF.9000005@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MUN-Disclaimer: http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/elect_communications_disclaimer_2012.php X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks Stefan (and also to Dex for getting Martin's grabber images. ) Yes, SA is continent 4, and still trying to reach the southern hemisphere! QRV again tonight. 4.7 Amps to a 100m wire at 15m. 73 Joe [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: b8b011f938af8abc4b241335cabd0691 Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA - Venezuela opening Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:444555616:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d61894fa9a34669b8 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Thanks Stefan (and also to Dex for getting Martin's grabber images. ) Yes, SA is continent 4, and still trying to reach the southern=20 hemisphere! QRV again tonight. 4.7 Amps to a 100m wire at 15m. 73 Joe On Tue, 8 May 2012, Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer wrote: > Hi Dex, Joe, Martin, LF, > > Congratulations for the new continent Joe!! Is that your 4th? > > Dex, sunrise in YV is arround 10 UTC these days. > > There is a problem with the dropbox upload. An error massage comes up. We= =20 > will have to work on that today. However the Teamviewer link worked and s= o i=20 > was able to see the ongoing SpecLab instances. XKO was way stronger than= =20 > yesterday, a clear O copy! We'll publish the screenshots later. Probably= =20 > there was also a stronger copy of VO1NA and maybe others as well. Very=20 > interesting changing conds. Also the wideband window is very interesting = i=20 > find. It clearly shows that the noise is 15...20 dB above the RX+soundcar= d=20 > noise on each frequency in the LF band. > > Tnx to the US+CA stns for providing LF amateur signals. That is definitiv= ely=20 > helpful to get impressions about the path and understand the grabber as a= =20 > useful device! My first mail to Martin with the idea for a common LF proj= ect=20 > is dated *March, 29th*. And here we are! :-) > > We'll go on to play with an active E field antenna which may reduce the l= oacl=20 > QRM a bit. Currently a 80m long wire is used for reception. It is about 5= m=20 > above the ground in average. One part is close to the house. By analyzing= a=20 > wav file taken in YV i saw in a fast scrolling spectrogram that there is= =20 > still significant local QRM between the massive sferics. > > Also i think with this wav file it may be possible to find more suitable= =20 > settings for the noiseblanker. While the NB settings in DL or EU are=20 > optimised to reduce the QRM of DCF39, there may be more efficient setting= s=20 > for YV which concentrate on the sferics! So maybe we can get another dB o= r=20 > even 2? > > Lastly we're having first thoughts about constructing a loop antenna, may= be=20 > one which is sililar to the K9AY type... > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > Am 08.05.2012 14:11, schrieb Dexter McIntyre W4DEX: >> John Andrews wrote: >>> Joe, >>>=20 >>> It wasn't WD2XES -- I was only on from 0115 to 0200. I believe that's a= n=20 >>> "O", probably from WD2XKO. The frequency calibration on that screen loo= ks=20 >>> a little high. >>>=20 >>>=20 >> XKO was on. QRT at 1200 hrs. Sunrise time at Martin's QTH? >>=20 >> Dex > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php