Return-Path: Received: from mtain-df02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-df02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.214]) by air-md10.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMD103-8b9a4cc1ea2f101; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:46:55 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5D28E380000AE; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:46:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1P9NY5-0003MZ-Ag for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:45:09 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1P9NY4-0003MQ-SV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:45:08 +0100 Received: from 113-mo2-8.acn.waw.pl ([62.121.95.113] helo=paranoid.lipkowski.org) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P9NY2-0003i9-4u for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:45:08 +0100 Received: from paranoid.lipkowski.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id o9MJj4cL001585 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:45:04 +0200 Received: from localhost (sq5bpf@localhost) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.6/Submit) with ESMTP id o9MJj4OS001582 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:45:04 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: paranoid.lipkowski.org: sq5bpf owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:45:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Jacek Lipkowski To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score-sq5bpf: -2.601 () BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d64cc1ea2e5ed4 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > *Frequencies allowed:* 8.7kHz - 9.1kHz i wonder what would happen if you applied specifically for 8.0-8.990kHz (no frequency >9kHz). is expanding the frequency range above 9kHz a trick by OFCOM, so that they can show that they have juristiction? VY 73 Jacek / SQ5BPF