Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> Received: from mtain-mc06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mc06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.78]) by air-di05.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDI053-eac84bddd3e82ee; Sun, 02 May 2010 15:35:04 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-mc06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D85EB3800005F; Sun, 2 May 2010 15:35:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1O8evU-0006Iy-BL for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 May 2010 20:34:04 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1O8evT-0006Ip-W7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 May 2010 20:34:03 +0100 Received: from 113-mo2-8.acn.waw.pl ([62.121.95.113] helo=paranoid.lipkowski.org) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <sq5bpf@lipkowski.org>) id 1O8evR-0006KI-B4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 May 2010 20:34:03 +0100 Received: from paranoid.lipkowski.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id o42JXxFU023877 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Sun, 2 May 2010 21:33:59 +0200 Received: from localhost (sq5bpf@localhost) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.6/Submit) with ESMTP id o42JXxiC023874 for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Sun, 2 May 2010 21:33:59 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: paranoid.lipkowski.org: sq5bpf owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 21:33:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Jacek Lipkowski <sq5bpf@lipkowski.org> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <002f01caea22$0cc97f40$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005022112490.19751@paranoid.lipkowski.org> References: <h2g1f0624b91005020342l124839e6r28de2a9e69b9868@mail.gmail.com> <000401cae9e5$cd22c130$0402a8c0@laptopcore2>,<o2x1f0624b91005020459z2100f153n33669d73e37869d8@mail.gmail.com> <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C19A2156EA4@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> <002f01caea22$0cc97f40$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score-sq5bpf: -2.601 () BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: ROS 503.600kHz beacon Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604e4bddd3e62e15 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) On Sun, 2 May 2010, mal hamilton wrote: > That applies to most EU countries and the UK. This mode is illegal and a > good way to terminate a licence. > Those using it are at RISK. exactly my thoughts. if everyone rejected this mode on grounds that this is illegal, the author would be forced to either publish the specs, or to loose testing of his software by hams. actually maybe this is the authors plot - let hams test the software for a while, and then sell it to some commercial customer (probably not military, but mine communications perhaps?) VY 73 Jacek / SQ5BPF