Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp8333igc; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 01:08:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.188.66 with SMTP id fy2mr4963358wic.45.1394784516548; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 01:08:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s9si3573638wia.59.2014.03.14.01.08.36 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 01:08:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@btopenworld.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WOMby-0002pp-LG for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 07:32:58 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WOMby-0002pg-44 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 07:32:58 +0000 Received: from smtpout18.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.138]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WOMbv-00034c-Pd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 07:32:57 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=btopenworld.com Result=Signature OK X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A090201.5322B0A6.02E2,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=8/97,refid=2.7.2:2014.3.13.222115:17:8.317,ip=,rules=__HAS_FROM, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY, __CTYPE_MULTIPART, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __IN_REP_TO, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_WWW, __URI_NO_PATH, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __HTML_FONT_BLUE, __HAS_HTML, HTML_NO_HTTP, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODYTEXTH_SIZE_10000_LESS, __MIME_HTML, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML, __URI_NS, HTML_70_90 X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Received: from taurids (81.156.248.121) by smtpout18.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.100.99.10223) (authenticated as ganymede444) id 5318503B004D7E89 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 07:32:54 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1394782375; bh=RpHZWUMsIoMpzSQhUE3H7GXvh7ltSAYvdb3W1PBedYY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To; b=hbjMQWbnc6aSz/BOcQHJ5zeYsGoJLiq2kfYE1gb0u06K7uAE/Ow5pkLMwynPA0KFnNUOnSA1dTZu+Tcrslt5SANEfTC9wgmJx4b3clXyB++DfCIyfJb/BQvKDdxvYulr/R0FJ+97LZY0i7oKUfnI3L46NHke4Q1bLIOP4ZDK8wM= From: "Dave G3WCB." To: Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 07:32:54 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <1394776315.62062.YahooMailNeo@web133002.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: LF, Chris, Stefan, Has anybody reported any success with WSPR 2 on 137.5 kHz? I haven't seen any 137 kHz spots reported. I could probably radiate in that mode, given a few days notice. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: fefa6d96b1284f767a869566d1bc7791 Subject: RE: LF: LF tonite Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000A_01CF3F57.9CFDD820" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_50_60, HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01CF3F57.9CFDD820 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit LF, Chris, Stefan, Has anybody reported any success with WSPR 2 on 137.5 kHz? I haven't seen any 137 kHz spots reported. I could probably radiate in that mode, given a few days notice. 73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Chris Osborn Sent: 14 March 2014 05:52 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: LF tonite LF, Yes, the LF band appears dead as far as real QSO's are concerned. Following Dave G3YXM's RadCom article on LF / MF I beaconed and called CQ on 137.7 kHz extensively for consecutive weekends. My signals are not huge but have a range of several hundred km judging from the various grabbers' displays. Apart from one CW QSO with Dave on 136.5 kHz I had no other report or reply! LF operators are spread far too thinly and unless one makes a sked or advertises well in advance then the chances of a QSO are very slim. In the good old days the time for calling / QSO's used to be 'on the hour'. It's now probably time to have specific 'day and hour' periods each month for LF activity. If we knew that say the second Sunday in each month at 10.00Z would be activity time then maybe a few more ops would dust the cobwebs from their rusty LF rigs. 73 Chris G3XIZ On Friday, 14 March 2014, 1:03, Stefan Schäfer wrote: LF! There's not much activity these days on 137 kHz. I thought i spend the night in good old QRSS-60 on 136.172 kHz. Reports welcome :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01CF3F57.9CFDD820 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
LF,=20 Chris, Stefan,
 
Has=20 anybody reported any success with WSPR 2 on 137.5 kHz? I haven't seen = any 137=20 kHz spots reported.
 
I=20 could probably radiate in that mode, given a few days=20 notice.
 
73,=20 Dave G3WCB IO91RM
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Chris=20 Osborn
Sent: 14 March 2014 05:52
To:=20 rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: LF=20 tonite

LF,

Yes,=20 the LF band appears dead as far as real QSO's are = concerned.
Following=20 Dave G3YXM's RadCom article on LF / MF I beaconed and called CQ on = 137.7 kHz=20 extensively for consecutive weekends. My=20 signals are not huge but have a range of several hundred km judging = from the=20 various grabbers' displays. Apart=20 from one CW QSO with Dave on 136.5 kHz I had no other report or=20 reply!
LF=20 operators are spread far too thinly and unless one makes a sked or = advertises=20 well in advance then the chances of a QSO are very slim.
In=20 the good old days the time for calling / QSO's used to be 'on the=20 hour'. It's=20 now probably time to have specific  'day and hour' periods each = month for=20 LF activity. If=20 we knew that say the second Sunday in each month at 10.00Z would be = activity=20 time then maybe a few more ops would dust the cobwebs from their rusty = LF=20 rigs.
73 Chris=20 G3XIZ


On Friday, 14 March 2014, = 1:03, Stefan=20 Sch=E4fer <schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> = wrote:
LF!

There's not much activity = these days on=20 137 kHz. I thought i spend the
night in good old QRSS-60 on = 136.172=20 kHz.

Reports welcome :-)

73,=20 = Stefan/DK7FC



------=_NextPart_000_000A_01CF3F57.9CFDD820--