Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp50626igb; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 15:17:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.72.207 with SMTP id f15mr4304452wiv.60.1382221046103; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 15:17:26 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p2si2441200wix.1.2013.10.19.15.17.25 for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 15:17:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@btopenworld.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VXdiM-0000l4-5f for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 22:05:38 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VXdiL-0000kv-LY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 22:05:37 +0100 Received: from smtpout09.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.129]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VXdiJ-0006Mj-FQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 22:05:36 +0100 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=btopenworld.com Result=Signature OK X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A090209.5262F41E.0018,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=33/97,refid=2.7.2:2013.10.19.144215:17:33.181,ip=86.156.101.12,rules=__HAS_FROM, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __RUS_SUBJ_ALL_UCASE_1251, __RUS_SUBJ_ALL_UCASE_KOI8R, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __IN_REP_TO, __ANY_URI, URI_CONTAINS_EXE, __FRAUD_BODY_WEBMAIL, __URI_NO_WWW, __CP_URI_IN_BODY, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __FORWARDED_MSG, BODY_SIZE_4000_4999, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, __URI_NS, SXL_IP_DYNAMIC[12.101.156.86.fur], HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, RDNS_SUSP, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Received: from taurids (86.156.101.12) by smtpout09.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.100.99.10147-CB-6) (authenticated as ganymede444) id 52616B340016C31A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 22:05:34 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1382216735; bh=c6vWkyz4dnhbg3kJZ7Gs3i82LECuC5LBnzk+I3DmRiI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To; b=XbAClosN6GXsNikLjbfOYU0c/rrGjG/zYu3rHnG6wi4OKbEimket/5lHEcC5/Rs11lPvNk70MG5pe4l11zmFz3RqW8ej+EnX1j+2MDcRTqt0EcocSjqt5cOKWWU+oK7G+t5KMez/JIYPQ4cA1QukkBTu4fC8p5NVh1ms9H/mAZE= From: "Dave G3WCB." To: Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 22:05:39 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <5262EAEF.90704@gmx.net> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Tobias. I've downloaded the latest verion, but I get an error when I try to run it. The programme probably isn't designed to run on Windows 2000! Your signals looked easily strong enough to decode, if I can get the program working. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.20.0.129 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: d0d76c369792b807e0925732d18ad9b1 Subject: RE: LF: JT9 QSO on 475kHz? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1524 Hi, Tobias. I've downloaded the latest verion, but I get an error when I try to run it. The programme probably isn't designed to run on Windows 2000! Your signals looked easily strong enough to decode, if I can get the program working. I'll try and find an archive version that will run on my PC. 73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Tobias DG3LV Sent: 19 October 2013 21:26 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: JT9 QSO on 475kHz? Hi Dave ! The latest WSJT-X version 3590 uses JT9-1 exclusively. It can decode JT9 and JT65 simultaneously. (But i have not yet read the manual to the end.) 73 de dg3lv Tobias Am 19.10.2013 22:16, schrieb Dave G3WCB.: > Hi, Tobias. > > I'm listening also. Will you be using JT9-1 or JT9-2? > > 73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Rik Strobbe > Sent: 19 October 2013 21:12 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: RE: LF: JT9 QSO on 475kHz? > > > Hi Tobias, > > I just installed the most recent version of WSJRT-X and I'm listing on 474.2 > kHz dial / 1380 Hz audio. > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > ________________________________________ > Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] > namens Tobias DG3LV [DG3LV@gmx.net] > Verzonden: zaterdag 19 oktober 2013 21:36 > Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Onderwerp: Re: LF: JT9 QSO on 475kHz? > > Hi Rik ! > > Sven and me had been working on 1380 Hertz Audio and the standard > 474.200 kHz Dial. The Idea behind was, that there might be some Hams > around seeing a signal just below the WSPR passband and beeing curious > enough to explore whats going on there. Just to raise some more stations > to join in. > > 73 de dg3lv Tobias > > Am 19.10.2013 21:07, schrieb Rik Strobbe: >> Hello Tobias, >> >> what frequency do you use for JT9? >> >> 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T >> ________________________________________ >> Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens Tobias DG3LV [DG3LV@gmx.net] >> Verzonden: zaterdag 19 oktober 2013 20:28 >> Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Onderwerp: Re: LF: JT9 QSO on 475kHz? >> >> Hi Rik ! >> >> A second station will be Sven DF2FF, we have just done some tests with >> the new version of WSJT-X and had some QSOs. He is using a Softrock >> RxTx6.2 as I do. >> After 20:00h UTC conditions might be good enough to try some QSOs? >> >> 73 de dg3lv Tobias >> >> Am 19.10.2013 19:05, schrieb Rik Strobbe: >>> Hi Tobias, >>> >>> I don't have a specific day/hour in mind. Let's see if there is some more > response. >>> About "linear operation": I assume that you refer to frequency > conversion. The amplifiers do not have to be linear for JT2 (and WSPR). In > fact I do use a class D push-pull PA. >>> >>> 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens Tobias DG3LV [DG3LV@gmx.net] >>> Verzonden: zaterdag 19 oktober 2013 18:13 >>> Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>> Onderwerp: Re: LF: JT9 QSO on 475kHz? >>> >>> Hi Rik ! >>> >>> Yes, would be nice to have some QSOs again. At what time did you intend >>> to begin trying a QSO? >>> >>> There should be a couple of stations around, which are capable of linear >>> operation. >>> >>> Just updated my WSJT-X installation with >>> latest version of WSJT-X (dated 4.October 2013): >>> http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSJTX_121r3590.exe >>> >>> latest Manual rev 1.2, (dated 16.August 2013) >>> http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSJT-X_Users_Guide_v1.2.pdf >>> >>> 73 de dg3lv Tobias >>> >>> Am 19.10.2013 11:28, schrieb Rik Strobbe: >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> there is a lot of WSPR activity on 475kHz recently. >>>> >>>> Checking wsprnet.org I noticed that I copied 34 stations and was copied >>>> by 67 stations. 25 of these were copied by me and copied me, so >>>> potential QSO partners in JT9-2 mode. >>>> >>>> Anyone interested in some JT9 tests ? >>>> >>>> It would be nice to make some QSO's in this mode. >>>> >>>> 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T >>>> >>> >> > > >