X-GM-THRID: 1230838642890897898 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.115.73.3 with SMTP id a3cs217067wal; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.219.1 with SMTP id w1mr2714414qbq.1173819201943; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:53:21 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e19si4020587qbe.2007.03.13.13.53.19; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:53:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) DomainKey-Status: bad (test mode) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1HRDx7-0007GW-QY for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:50:37 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1HRDx7-0007GN-9g for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:50:37 +0000 Received: from smtp801.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.188.61]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HRDx4-0003Dn-FF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:50:37 +0000 Received: (qmail 22080 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2007 20:50:28 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:Importance:In-Reply-To; b=gQ6PnH2bcAlIdnVsXFs5nOi4+ZdRPP/NgHU5CMiwBAMnjAtxud4hyPUy3i4KNS/EbYn0d8gWZEzqcgzofZmaWDihOf6hKgvABxD7NLeCvOfT2jott39ks4RE5AeEaATM1bRHbQatNRfxl12P0g7/po9dfsBQvdxaccXkXhygfOY= ; Received: from unknown (HELO aquarids) (ganymede444@btinternet.com@81.158.135.81 with login) by smtp801.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2007 20:50:28 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: L_Q_Gj4VM1nuPLHZYFxWB5IabeT8gyiIbKl8yZb21imhws90xbqhzF23EUQGDrUbGeQJx3ccQFhr4nzAEF3MjzJvTmrjr85.LR9mds2U7FHJ2sym7_4oDyn3r3awXRN.eBfBJifug91Z From: "Dave G3WCB" To: Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:50:52 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <8bf118410703130819n576c0c26t11a38427a2008a8e@mail.gmail.com> DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: LF: RE: 500 bandplan? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0014_01C765B1.49AFE730" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_20_30, HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3643 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C765B1.49AFE730 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear LF, Dave, I think it was me that kicked-off the original discussion. It makes = sense for people using narrow modes like QRSS and DFCW to cluster = together somewhere within a 100 Hz window - the width of an "Argo" = screen. I've got crystals for 503.5 and 501.5, so either of those two = slots would get my vote! This reflector seems a reasonable place for 500 kHz activity to be = discussed, provided we put "500" in the subject line to allow mail = filtering as VY1JA suggested. I did some tests last week-end, and I can listen on 137 kHz QRSS/DFCW = while sending on 500 kHz, which makes cross-band a possibility. The = man-machine interface isn't so good, as the PCs are in different rooms! = I need to work on this a bit, but hope to be QRV cross-band soon (not = this week-end..got visitors.) 73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org = [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Dave Pick Sent: 13 March 2007 15:20 To: LF Group Subject: LF: 500 bandplan? Someone had to ask the question "Do we need a band-plan?". Finbar is beaconing down the bottom, which seem OK to me, I've been = trying for QSOs near the top because my local noises seem to congregate = near 501kHz. Do we want to suggest areas for different activities like = on 136?=20 In fact do we need to set up a Google / Yahoo group (or is there = already one going) for European 500k activity to be discussed or is this = the place to do it? Questions questions! Discuss... Dave. --=20 G3YXM IO92BK Birmingham UK ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C765B1.49AFE730 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BF
Dear=20 LF, Dave,
 
I=20 think it was me that kicked-off the original discussion. It makes sense = for=20 people using narrow modes like QRSS and DFCW to cluster together = somewhere=20 within a 100 Hz window - the width of an "Argo" screen. I've got = crystals for=20 503.5 and 501.5, so either of those two slots would get my=20 vote!
 
This=20 reflector seems a reasonable place for 500 kHz activity to be discussed, = provided we put "500" in the subject line to allow mail filtering as = VY1JA=20 suggested.
 
I did=20 some tests last week-end, and I can listen on 137 kHz QRSS/DFCW while = sending on=20 500 kHz, which makes cross-band a possibility. The man-machine interface = isn't=20 so good, as the PCs are in different rooms! I need to work on this a = bit, but=20 hope to be QRV cross-band soon (not this week-end..got=20 visitors.)
 
73,=20 Dave G3WCB IO91RM
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Dave=20 Pick
Sent: 13 March 2007 15:20
To: LF=20 Group
Subject: LF: 500 bandplan?

Someone = had to=20 ask the question "Do we need a band-plan?".

Finbar is beaconing = down=20 the bottom, which seem OK to me, I've been trying for QSOs near the = top=20 because my local noises seem to congregate near 501kHz. Do we want to = suggest=20 areas for different activities like on 136?
In fact do we need to = set up a=20 Google / Yahoo group (or is there already one going) for European 500k = activity to be discussed or is this the place to do it?
Questions = questions!

Discuss...

Dave.

--=20
G3YXM IO92BK Birmingham UK
------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C765B1.49AFE730--