Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp212125igc; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 05:59:58 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.216.68 with SMTP id oo4mr1920587wjc.79.1392731998255; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 05:59:58 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h7si14667458wja.53.2014.02.18.05.59.56 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 05:59:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=fail (test mode) header.i=@btopenworld.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WFl0P-0003uX-6K for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:46:37 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WFl0O-0003uO-ES for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:46:36 +0000 Received: from smtpout15.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.135]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1WFl0L-0008Vl-LK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:46:35 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=btopenworld.com Result=Signature OK X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A090206.53036437.01CA,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=8/97,refid=2.7.2:2014.2.18.111215:17:8.317,ip=,rules=__HAS_FROM, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, SUBJ_STARTS_IN_SPACE, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY, __CTYPE_MULTIPART, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __IN_REP_TO, __KNOWN_FREEWEB_URI1[http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ [blogspot.com] [blogspot.com]], __ANY_URI, BLOGSPOT_URI, ECARD_KNOWN_DOMAINS, __CP_URI_IN_BODY, __HTML_FONT_BLUE, __HAS_HTML, BODY_SIZE_10000_PLUS, BODYTEXTH_SIZE_10000_LESS, __MIME_HTML, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML, __URI_NS, KNOWN_FREEWEB_URI X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Received: from taurids (109.154.125.202) by smtpout15.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.100.99.10223) (authenticated as ganymede444) id 52DF227300A4B9D0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:46:31 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1392731193; bh=VF4aP8pEjvZ43OW40BGY9BeZVXS+sHveUU74hXxx9N4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To; b=qNYErMF/wexTGIUah8HCwgtM7PiK85WrXbRstEiSl5zLQYrzSXapDISX2dJiUROiY6O9PgStCmJ8Tqjgh4L6hxGeR4Oy8SnHKkG4isIBVs5+BQcYbT5IZe7R19QVktt0uBWpqr2Sdup49lkBEq5iqfRUH0K5ulNRHH6oxXW47tY= From: "Dave G3WCB." To: Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:46:31 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 In-Reply-To: <53035CE2.1090801@psk31.plus.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Eddie, Roger, Throwing good scientific practice out of the window, I changed two things at once (well, almost)! Eddie's transmissions, up to and including the 11-46 utc spot, were received using the loop in 60 -240 deg orientation, but with the main Tee antenna connected to the TX. I now realize that coupling from this main antenna is affecting the directionality of the loop, and also it's apparent sensitivity. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.20.0.135 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image X-Scan-Signature: a1fa904463615545653fc893de869d24 Subject: LF: WSPR Reports - G3XBM, G3ZJO, G4KPX...(2) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0034_01CF2CAF.D46AED30" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_20_30, HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0034_01CF2CAF.D46AED30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Eddie, Roger, Throwing good scientific practice out of the window, I changed two things at once (well, almost)! Eddie's transmissions, up to and including the 11-46 utc spot, were received using the loop in 60 -240 deg orientation, but with the main Tee antenna connected to the TX. I now realize that coupling from this main antenna is affecting the directionality of the loop, and also it's apparent sensitivity. Eddie's 12-06 utc transmission was received with the loop in the "favourable" 165- 345 deg direction, but with the TX antenna still connected. You can see that the signal is about 9 dB weaker. At this point the penny dropped and I realized what was going on. All WSPR spots after 12-14 UTC are being received with the loop in the 165-345 deg orientation, and the main antenna disconnected. Eddie's transmissions now seem to exhibit a lot more signal strength variability, and I haven't received any spots from Roger since 12-00 today. So it looks like all my "improvements" have made reception worse....doh! I think that the best course of action would be to put things back to the pre-12-00 utc configuration while Roger makes his improvements. Suggestions, anyone? 73 Dave G3WCB IO91RM -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of g3zjo Sent: 18 February 2014 13:15 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: WSPR Reports - G3XBM, G3ZJO, G4KPX... Dave That will be an interesting test. I have a couple of similar loops and they just do not work here due to induced noise from the mains, I have tried ground level and bottom of the garden test to no avail. As I get away from one source of noise I start to approach another. I also have a small 'window sill' loop which I took mobile / portable and it performs really well, away from home. Roger I will put an RX on and run the Grabber to check if I see you. May I suggest that you TX at other than the 6 an 8 minute slots. I TX at 06 etc. and also ruin a little of 08 etc. slots. 73 Eddie On 18/02/2014 12:51, Roger Lapthorn wrote: Thanks Dave, Your reports have been very useful to me. Going to try an auto-transformer to see if I can match the earth-electrode "loop" any better later. Added a series inductor yesterday (about 200uH?) which increased antenna current about 20% 73s Roger G3XBM On 18 February 2014 12:23, Dave G3WCB. wrote: Chaps, I'm aware that you've been using my WSPR reports to gauge the effectiveness of your various QRP WSPR transmissions. I'm using a 80cm square tuned loop at ground level with a fet pre-amp, feeding my trusty ICOM IC-PCR1000. I've tried to keep the RX set up unchanged, but the loop is inclined to "weathercock" around a bit, especially with the storms recently. Also, my WSPR RX doesn't run 24x7, as I use the PC for other duties. I went out this morning, and found that the loop is aligned along an axis running 60 - 240 deg, which means that stations in the IO92 direction are pretty much in the null direction. As an experiment, from 1214 UTC today I have aligned the loop antenna in a 165 - 345 deg direction. To remove any interaction with the main station "Tee" antenna, which is in the same general area, I have disconnected this and moved my WSPR TX on to the short vertical antenna, which is 30m away from the loop. I'll swap the loop back to it's 60 - 240 deg orientation later on - I'll announce when I've done this. 73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM -- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ http://qss2.blogspot.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. ------=_NextPart_000_0034_01CF2CAF.D46AED30 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Eddie,=20 Roger,
 
Throwing good scientific practice out of the window, I changed = two things=20 at once (well, almost)!  Eddie's transmissions, up to and including = the=20 11-46 utc spot, were received using the loop in 60 -240 deg orientation, = but=20 with the main Tee antenna connected to the TX. I now realize that = coupling from=20 this main antenna is affecting the directionality of the loop, and also = it's=20 apparent sensitivity.
 
Eddie's 12-06 utc transmission was received with the loop in = the=20 "favourable" 165- 345 deg direction, but with the TX antenna still = connected.=20 You can see that the signal is about 9 dB weaker. At this point the = penny=20 dropped and I realized what was going on. All WSPR spots after 12-14 UTC = are=20 being received with the loop in the 165-345 deg orientation, and the = main=20 antenna disconnected.
 
Eddie's transmissions now seem to exhibit a lot more signal = strength=20 variability, and I haven't received any spots from Roger since 12-00 = today. So=20 it looks like all my "improvements" have made reception=20 worse....doh!
 
I=20 think that the best course of action would be to put things back to the=20 pre-12-00 utc configuration while Roger makes his improvements. = Suggestions,=20 anyone?
 
73=20 Dave G3WCB IO91RM 
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of=20 g3zjo
Sent: 18 February 2014 13:15
To:=20 rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: WSPR Reports - = G3XBM,=20 G3ZJO, G4KPX...

Dave
That will be an = interesting test.=20 I have a couple of similar loops and they just do not work here due to = induced=20 noise from the mains, I have tried ground level and bottom of the = garden test=20 to no avail. As I get away from one source of noise I start to = approach=20 another.
I also have a small 'window sill' loop which I took mobile = /=20 portable and it performs really well, away from = home.

Roger
I will=20 put an RX on and run the Grabber to check if I see you. May I suggest = that you=20 TX at other than the 6 an 8 minute slots. I TX at 06 etc. and also = ruin a=20 little of 08 etc. slots.

73 Eddie


On 18/02/2014 = 12:51,=20 Roger Lapthorn wrote:=20
Thanks Dave,

Your reports have been very useful to me. = Going to=20 try an auto-transformer to see if I can match the earth-electrode = "loop" any=20 better later. Added a series inductor yesterday (about 200uH?) which = increased antenna current about 20%

73s
Roger=20 G3XBM


On 18 February 2014 12:23, Dave G3WCB. = <ganymede444@btopenworld.com> = wrote:


Chaps,

I'm=20 aware that you've been using my WSPR reports to gauge the=20 effectiveness
of your various QRP WSPR transmissions. I'm using = a 80cm=20 square tuned loop
at ground level with a fet pre-amp, feeding = my trusty=20 ICOM IC-PCR1000. I've
tried to keep the RX set up unchanged, = but the=20 loop is inclined to
"weathercock" around a bit, especially with = the=20 storms recently.

Also, my WSPR RX doesn't run 24x7, as I = use the PC=20 for other duties.

I went out this morning, and found that = the loop=20 is aligned along an axis
running 60 - 240 deg, which means that = stations in the IO92 direction are
pretty much in the null = direction.=20 As an experiment, from 1214 UTC today I
have aligned the loop = antenna=20 in a 165 - 345 deg direction. To remove any
interaction with = the main=20 station "Tee" antenna, which is in the same
general area, I = have=20 disconnected this and moved my WSPR TX on to the short
vertical = antenna, which is 30m away from the loop.

I'll swap the = loop back=20 to it's 60 - 240 deg orientation later on - I'll
announce when = I've=20 done this.

73, Dave G3WCB=20 IO91RM





--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
http://qss2.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm



This=20 email is free from viruses and malware because avast! = Antivirus protection is active.=20 =



------=_NextPart_000_0034_01CF2CAF.D46AED30--