Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.203.68 with SMTP id ko4csp36203igc; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 09:58:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.101.40 with SMTP id fd8mr13955118wib.1.1396025900377; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 09:58:20 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ln4si2652758wic.64.2014.03.28.09.58.19 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 09:58:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@btopenworld.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WTZcn-0005OM-F7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:27:21 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WTZcn-0005OA-0p for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:27:21 +0000 Received: from smtpout02.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.122]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WTZck-0003SK-RH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:27:19 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=btopenworld.com Result=Signature OK X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A090209.5335A2E3.016E,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=7/97,refid=2.7.2:2014.3.21.95116:17:7.944,ip=,rules=__HAS_FROM, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __IN_REP_TO, __ANY_URI, LINK_TO_IMAGE, __URI_NO_WWW, __URI_NO_PATH, __STOCK_PHRASE_7, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __FORWARDED_MSG, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_2000_2999, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, __URI_NS, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Received: from taurids (86.163.170.8) by smtpout02.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.100.99.10223) (authenticated as ganymede444) id 5321749E00B18EF9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:27:14 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1396024038; bh=e11cVd4GOGkZ1LwSogi8rjO/Vrzs5IyecN+d0MOr3ds=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To; b=mBf/15yNeFuJsTKgSrkk3zNunmiPNyXQwAb6741zKJR+e88i+qIpFOk7ZEg+pkLAuoNJKPUre+UMzxfPlm96hNMImy1qf9pPC2NXx2EYsjdPacKENa8pzZ9834g1hY2lhMzzXhbiq7mJOg8qx2UyevEzqnDHaFVpzlMozXVP8Zs= From: "Dave G3WCB." To: Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:27:13 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <53354A47.5050205@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Joe, Polypropylene caps are recommended for LF work. WIMA MKP types work well. FKPs are even better, if you can find them. It's the current through them that seems to be the killer, so it's best to make up the desired value with parallel combinations. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.20.0.122 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: d7907c3bf895ca41e0bedc3fa074f0d4 Subject: RE: LF: Polyprop caps [Was VO1NA_OK2BVG] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Joe, Polypropylene caps are recommended for LF work. WIMA MKP types work well. FKPs are even better, if you can find them. It's the current through them that seems to be the killer, so it's best to make up the desired value with parallel combinations. 73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Stefan Schäfer Sent: 28 March 2014 10:09 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA_OK2BVG Hi Joe, Class E is fascinating and can be high efficient, 98% or so. However the output impedance has to be quite exactly 50 Ohm +-j0! A SWR of 1.5 can reduce the efficiency significantly so that all the advantages of the class E design are lost. Thus, i'm using class-D designs. I have 2 PAs for 630m. A small one running at 12 VDC, https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/MF/100W-475KHZ-PA.png and https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/MF/DK7FC%20472%20kHz%20PA%2015W %2B100W.JPG and a large one giving 0...1.2 kW, running as a H bridge, switching directly at 320V DC. The efficiency can easily reach more than 90% too. For you, i assume a normal class D using 2 (or 2x2) FETs against ground, using a ferrite output transformer may be the best choice. This design is used by many active MF stns, i know. What power range do you inted to realise? 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 28.03.2014 00:24, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: > Hi Stefan, > > I have some IRFP140BPF hexfets. Using Alan's G3NYK Class E > design spreadsheet for 200 watts at 13.8 Vdd gives 144 and 119 nf > for C1 and C2 and 1.14 uH for L. I have used silver mica for C1 and C2 > but these are expensive. What do you use? I remember mentioned your > class e experiments. > > 73 > Joe > > On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, Stefan Schäfer wrote: > >> >> Am 26.03.2014 19:36, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >>> Perhaps some day I will QRO! >>> >>> Joe >> >> Yes, please :-) >> >> 73, Stefan >> >>