Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:37:23 +0000 Received: by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1ErgAs-0006XC-1F for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:37:22 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1ErgAr-0006Wd-Oi for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:37:21 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ErgAX-00049c-2u for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:37:01 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ErgAW-00049T-N0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:37:00 +0000 Received: from smtp810.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.200]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.51) id 1ErhH4-00015k-QP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:48:07 +0000 Received: (qmail 12769 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2005 18:36:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aquarids) (ganymede444@btinternet.com@86.141.120.138 with login) by smtp810.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Dec 2005 18:36:38 -0000 From: "Dave G3WCB" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:37:28 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <000f01c60bda$372cd960$bf2f7ad5@w4o8m9> Subject: RE: LF: Xmas LF Acty Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Dear LF, How does 136.200 exact look in the USA?...I can only transmit on multiples of 10 Hz :-( If the freq is clear, I can also beacon tonight. 73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of James Moritz Sent: 28 December 2005 18:12 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Xmas LF Acty Dear LF group, Thanks for the replies; I will try to set my frequency immediately LF of CT1DRP's signal, assuming I can see it, or 136.317kHz otherwise. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU ----- Original Message ----- From: John Andrews To: Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 5:50 PM Subject: Re: LF: Xmas LF Acty > Jim, > > That's good news! However, the area around 135.92 kHz has now become > useless in the U.S. and Canada due to a west coast military station. We > have suggested 136.318 kHz as an alternative, and CT1DRP will be trying > it tonight. That frequency should be clear of Loran lines for about +/-2 > Hz in the eastern and central U.S. If you pick a spot in that range, a > number of us will be watching. > > John Andrews, W1TAG/WD2XES > > James Moritz wrote: > > Dear LF Group, > > > > I have now reassembled my LF station and am now QRV again. It looks like > > being a calm night weather-wise, so the antenna should stay up. So I > > will put out some T/A beacon signals tonight from around 2300utc onwards > > for a few hours at least. I will try QRSS30 on about 135.922kHz +/-, > > with about 1W ERP, unless anyone has any more interesting suggestions > > before then. Any reports will be very welcome. > > > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > > 73 de M0BMU > > >