Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk
Delivery-date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:28:22 +0100
Received: from ptb-spamcore01.plus.net ([192.168.71.1])
	  by pih-mxcore05.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DQu50-0003G8-Fc 
	  for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:28:22 +0100
Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD)
	id 1DQu97-00032B-2v
	for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:32:37 +0100
Received: from [192.168.101.78] (helo=pih-mxcore12.plus.net)
	by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD)
	id 1DQu96-000322-UY
	for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:32:36 +0100
Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20])
	  by pih-mxcore12.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DQu4z-0003qV-Sf 
	  for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:28:21 +0100
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1DQu4U-0005bo-Oo
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:27:50 +0100
Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1DQu4U-0005bf-A2
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:27:50 +0100
Received: from smtp806.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.196])
	by relay.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DQu4S-00009g-TM
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:27:50 +0100
Received: from unknown (HELO aquarids) (ganymede444@217.42.137.82 with login)
  by smtp806.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Apr 2005 21:27:43 -0000
From: "Dave G3WCB" <ganymede444@btopenworld.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:27:49 +0100
Message-ID: <PAEFLMFGBDKKCONLMLBICEFFCDAA.ganymede444@btopenworld.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
In-Reply-To: <E1DQoqm-0004tL-E9@post.thorcom.com>
Importance: Normal
X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 217.12.12.196 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of btopenworld.com
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS=0.516
Subject: LF: <more> Wolf tests
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no 
	version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00)

Dave,

What time will you start transmitting? (Sorted out the calibration of my
sound card, now!)

Cheers.

Dave G3WCB

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Dave Pick
Sent: 27 April 2005 16:54
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Wolf tests


John and co.

I'll run it overnight on 137.422 then at 300W or so.
Let's hope conditions are still OK

Dave G3YXM

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of John Andrews
Sent: 27 April 2005 14:28
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: Re: RE: Re: Re: Wolf tests

Dave,

> I'm willing to give it a try.
> What frequency would be good for you?

The 137.441 kHz frequency has generally worked well on both sides, though I
chose it more for EU than North American reasons. 137.422 kHz is clear of
Loran-C over a lot of the U.S., and might be the best choice for a TA
experiment.

John Andrews