Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1181; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TINY_FONT,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u42GMNgf014652 for ; Mon, 2 May 2016 18:22:23 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1axGX4-0002ww-At for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 May 2016 17:17:14 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1axGX3-0002wn-Mn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 May 2016 17:17:13 +0100 Received: from smtpdb9.aruba.it ([62.149.158.251] helo=smtpdb7.aruba.it) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1axGWw-0008PV-In for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 May 2016 17:17:12 +0100 Received: from ik0vve.net ([62.149.158.90]) by smtpcmd03.ad.aruba.it with bizsmtp id pUH41s00s1xJdJu01UH401; Mon, 02 May 2016 18:17:05 +0200 Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 18:17:04 +0200 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <572619ED.1040402@posteo.de> References: =?iso-8859-1?q?=3CO6FK1F=244E758375A73045921482661B20E9AE5A=40ik0vve?= =?iso-8859-1?q?=2Enet=3E_=3CO6HQVJ=242F7891F4C3FDD2B2A991A8F465C21493?= =?iso-8859-1?q?=40ik0vve=2Enet=3E_=3C572619ED=2E1040402=40posteo=2Ede?= =?iso-8859-1?q?=3E?= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sensitivity: 3 From: "Max IK0VVE" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-XaM3-API-Version: V3(R2) X-SenderIP: 212.66.112.179 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 62.149.158.251 (smtpdb9.aruba.it) used invalid HELO/EHLO smtpdb7.aruba.it - verification failed X-Scan-Signature: eec106d36eb876515d296e51093c048c Subject: Re: LF: testing VLF grabber Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_=__=_XaM3_.1462205824.2A.371889.42.19411.52.42.007.1092665549" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 7973 --_=__=_XaM3_.1462205824.2A.371889.42.19411.52.42.007.1092665549 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Stefan,thanks for suggestions.=0A=0ATonight I'll suspend the grabber s= ession to implement the 1pps GPS.=0AThis was just a testing to see if I'v= e problem with web upload, pc, etc... At the moment I'm using an old note= book that gives me the possibility to run a couple of SL sessions without= wasting much energy.=C2=A0=0AOk for filtering the reception, this will i= mprove for sure the signal quality.=0AUnfortunately, also living in a sma= ll rural suburb, I've a lot of noise for some years now "thanks" to new n= eighbor (LED lights), so I'm looking to install all system in a quieter p= lace that can be easily approachable by a 5 ghz LAN, may be I could get i= deas from your remote station, HI.=0A=0A=0AI know that IW4DXW Riccardo an= d IK7SLZ Domenico are warming up for VLF transmission. Rick transmitted f= or a while yesterday night but some capacitors problem impede a good syst= em performance, so We are looking for new C's. I'm in the center between = the two OM so could be a good place for RX test.=0ANot so many Italian HA= M in VLF and LF now.=0A=0A=0AThanks for now!=0A=0A=0A73, Max IK0VVE=0A=0A= =0A______________________________=C2=A0...here some of my HAM Radio proje= cts...SkyGeM RotatorAntennaDinamicaRCR-DX=0Awww.ik0vve.net=0A=0A=0ADa: ow= ner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=0AA: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=0ACc: = =0AData: Sun, 01 May 2016 16:59:57 +0200=0AOggetto: Re: LF: testing VLF g= rabber=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A =0A=0A=0AHello Max, =0A=0A=0A=0AThat's nice, ve= ry interesting and the configuration looks quite optimal.=0A=0AAre you al= ready using the noise blanker and band pass filter centered=0Aat 8.27 kHz= ?=0A=0AWe are in 940 km distance. That could be possible. But you would n= eed a=0A47 uHz window to see something i think.=0A=0AYou wrote you're usi= ng ICV as the reference. In the past i have heared=0Athat ICV is not so s= table (relative to other msk transmitters in the=0Aband). Do you have a s= tereo soundcard and could use the 1 pps option=0Awhen using a cheap GPS m= odule?=0A=0A=0A=0AAny discussions on Italian forums regarding stations pr= eparing for=0Atransmissions?=0A=0A=0A=0A73, Stefan=0A=0A=0A=0AAm 01.05.20= 16 11:11, schrieb Max IK0VVE:=0A=0A Hi=0Adear friends,=0A added on my w= ebsite a 1 mHz DB=0Agrabber:=C2=A0http://www.ik0vve.net/?page_id=3D377.=0A= Optimizations will follow and even suggestions will be=0Aappreciated.=0A= =0A=0A =0A 73, Max IK0VVE=0A =0A=0A =0A=0A =0A=0A =0A =0A _____= _________________________=0A =0A =0A =C2=A0=0A ...here some of my HAM= Radio projects...=0A SkyGeM=0ARotator=0A AntennaDinamica=0A RCR-DX=0A= =0A=0A =0A www.ik0vve.net=0A =0A=0A =0A=0A Da:=0Aowner-rsgb_lf_gro= up@blacksheep.org=0A A:=0Arsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=0A Cc:=0A =0A = Data:=0ASat, 30 Apr 2016 06:48:51 +0200=0A Oggetto:=0ALF: testing VLF gr= abber=0A =0A=0A =0A=0AHi all,=0A yesterday I completed a first step fo= r an online dreamer band=0Agrabber.=0A You can find my shared real time = archive here:=C2=A0ik0vve dropbox=0A At the moment the antenna is a 60 w= ires 1sq meter loop, a little=0Alow noise pre and SL locked on Italian LF= ICV station.=0A Direction is N/S.=0A Of course I'll do some improvemen= t in the next days, I would try=0Ato better tune the antenna.=C2=A0=0A =0A= =0A =0A Max IK0VVE=0A =0A=0A =0A =0A=0A =0A=0A =0A =0A _________= _____________________=0A =0A =0A =C2=A0=0A ...here some of my HAM Rad= io projects...=0A SkyGeM=0ARotator=0A AntennaDinamica=0A RCR-DX=0A =0A= =0A =0A www.ik0vve.net=0A =0A =0A =0A =0A=0A=0A=0A --_=__=_XaM3_.1462205824.2A.371889.42.19411.52.42.007.1092665549 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Stefan,thanks for suggestions.

Tonight I'll suspend the grabber = session to implement the 1pps GPS.
This was just a testing to s= ee if I've problem with web upload, pc, etc... At the moment I'm using an= old notebook that gives me the possibility to run a couple of SL session= s without wasting much energy. 
Ok for filtering the recep= tion, this will improve for sure the signal quality.
Unfortunat= ely, also living in a small rural suburb, I've a lot of noise for some ye= ars now "thanks" to new neighbor (LED lights), so I'm looking to install = all system in a quieter place that can be easily approachable by a 5 ghz = LAN, may be I could get ideas from your remote station, HI.
I know that IW4DXW Riccardo and IK7SLZ Domenico are warming u= p for VLF transmission. Rick transmitted for a while yesterday night but = some capacitors problem impede a good system performance, so We are looki= ng for new C's. I'm in the center between the two OM so could be a good p= lace for RX test.
Not so many Italian HAM in VLF and LF now.

Thanks for now!

73, Max I= K0VVE


______________________________<= /span>

 
...here some of my HAM Radio projects...



=0A
Da: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
=0A
A: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
=0A
Cc:
=0A
Data: Sun, 01 May 2016 16:59:57 +0200<= /div>=0A
Oggetto: Re: LF: testing VLF grabber
= =0A
=0A=0A=0A=0A =0A=0A=0AHello Max,
=0A
=0AThat's nice, very = interesting and the configuration looks quite optimal.
=0AAre you alre= ady using the noise blanker and band pass filter centered=0Aat 8.27 kHz?<= br>=0AWe are in 940 km distance. That could be possible. But you would ne= ed a=0A47 uHz window to see something i think.
=0AYou wrote you're usi= ng ICV as the reference. In the past i have heared=0Athat ICV is not so s= table (relative to other msk transmitters in the=0Aband). Do you have a s= tereo soundcard and could use the 1 pps option=0Awhen using a cheap GPS m= odule?
=0A
=0AAny discussions on Italian forums regarding stations = preparing for=0Atransmissions?
=0A
=0A73, Stefan
=0A
=0AAm 01= .05.2016 11:11, schrieb Max IK0VVE:=0A
=0A
Hi=0Ade= ar friends,=0A
added on my website a 1 mHz DB=0Agrabber: http://www.ik0vve.= net/?page_id=3D377.
=0A
Optimizations will follow and even= suggestions will be=0Aappreciated.
=0A

=0A
=0A 73, Max IK0VVE
=0A

=0A
=0A
=0A
=0A
=0A

______________________________

=0A
=0A <= /div>=0A
 
=0A
...here some of my HAM Radio projects...=0A =0A = =0A =0A

=0A
=0A =0A
=0A
=0A
Da:=0Aowner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=0A =0A
Cc:=0A =0A
Data:=0ASat, 30 Apr 2016 06= :48:51 +0200
=0A
Oggetto:=0ALF: testing VLF grabber
=0A
=0A

=0AHi = all,=0A
yesterday I completed a first step for an online dreamer ba= nd=0Agrabber.
=0A
You can find my shared real time archive her= e: ik0vve dropbox
=0A
At the moment the antenna is a= 60 wires 1sq meter loop, a little=0Alow noise pre and SL locked on Itali= an LF ICV station.
=0A
Direction is N/S.
=0A
Of cou= rse I'll do some improvement in the next days, I would try=0Ato better tu= ne the antenna. 
=0A

=0A
=0A
Max IK0VVE<= /div>=0A

=0A
=0A

=0A
=0A
=0A
=0A

______________________________

=0A
=0A =0A
 
=0A
...here some of my HAM Radio projects...
=0A= =0A AntennaDinamica
=0A =0A

=0A =
=0A =0A
=0A
=0A
=0A
=0A=
=0A=0A=0A
--_=__=_XaM3_.1462205824.2A.371889.42.19411.52.42.007.1092665549--