Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9217 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2004 07:46:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan02.plus.net) (212.159.14.236) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 2 Jan 2004 07:46:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 97963 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2004 07:46:56 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore02.plus.net (212.159.14.216) by ptb-mxscan02.plus.net with SMTP; 2 Jan 2004 07:46:56 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1AcK1H-000PNH-RO for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 07:46:55 +0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1AcK0E-0000qQ-1i for rs_out@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 07:45:50 +0000 Received: from [194.217.242.88] (helo=anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1AcK0D-0000qH-BP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 07:45:49 +0000 Received: from telemetry.demon.co.uk ([194.222.19.114]) by anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AcK0B-000L7B-0U for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 07:45:48 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 09:24:58 +0000 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Tom Boucher" References: <200312301817.hBUIHvQ11107@mailgate5.cinetic.de> In-reply-to: <200312301817.hBUIHvQ11107@mailgate5.cinetic.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Turnpike Integrated Version 5.01 U Subject: Re: LF: TR-Switch for new TX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 1 Hans I put two back-to-back silicon diodes across the relay output to my receiver as overload protection. 73, Tom G3OLB In message <200312301817.hBUIHvQ11107@mailgate5.cinetic.de>, Hans- Albrecht Haffa writes > p {margin: 0px} > > Dear Lowfers, > just I am designing a TR-switch for my new TX. Estimated Power > about 60dbm/60 Ohm. > The current situation with my TX 70W/60 Ohm: > > The RX-Path is swiched via two reed-Relays (homemade coaxial ones, > for qsk operation) to the receiver input, the TX-Path is switched > via a reed-relay to the PA both from the common input of > low-pass-filter, whitch is allways in the aerial path. My RX is an > EKD 300 (Funkwerk Köpenick, late DDR). In transmit operation this > will cause an sidetone with an pretty high volume, but not too much > annoying noisy. > > My experiments with an 1 Watt driver circuit: > > The signal Path: Oscillator - Driver 1 Watt - Attenuator switchable > 0d B...50 dB - TR-relays - RX-Input > > TR-relays is a series of one Vac-Relay and three Reed-Relays (2 > spst, 1 spdt). > > All build up with coax connectors. It seems to be that I am still > far away from a S9 signal durig transmitting, even with this 1 > Watt-Driver. > How You have solved this task? What is done in commercial equipment > with similar power? > Is it necesary to have anyway a mute circuit for the receiver? An > input voltage of 1 Volt will not be dangerous for the RX-input and > cause some distortionin the audio-signal, but for a sidetone this > is not a problem. > Waiting for reply > > 55, > > Hans-Albrecht Haffa > > DK 8 ND > >   > > ______________________________________________________________________________ > Erdbeben im Iran: Zehntausende Kinder brauchen Hilfe. UNICEF hilft > den > Kindern - helfen Sie mit! https://www.unicef.de/spe/spe_03.php > -- Tom Boucher 'Hedgerows' Sheldon Honiton Devon EX14 4QS