Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
From: "Gary - G4WGT" <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 13:28:07 +0100
Message-ID: <NKEMLGOEKANPNJOBFBAFGEONCOAA.g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <44F9803B.26450.6451FCC@localhost>
Subject: RE: LF: Signal image
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Hi Mike,

Ah, it looks like something knocked out part of your X, I never change the
settings of SpecLab very much & I did a check on DCF39 (much stronger signal
than yours) & no image there using same setup, just changed receiver
frequency.

I will send an attachment direct to you (too large for LF reflector) & see
what you make of it.

73

Gary - G4WGT.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Mike Dennison
Sent: 02 September 2006 13:00
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: Signal image


Gary,

This was almost certainly me. I am not aware of a problem. How does
my sig strength compare with other stations? Does the problem change
when you alter the receive gain?

Mike, G3XDV
==========

> Just received a strong signal near 137.700 (SpecLab not calibrated),
> it looks like G3TADV, probably a mis-key. Big problem is that there is
> an image at plus & minus about 992 Hz. I have not seen this happen on
> a normally received signal. Has the operator got a Tx problem ??
>
> Gary - G4WGT.
>