From: "Gary - G4WGT" <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 19:33:51 +0100
Message-ID: <NKEMLGOEKANPNJOBFBAFGEAFCEAA.g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <003801c53d2c$8c0f5e80$6507a8c0@Main>
Importance: Normal
Subject: LF: RE: Re: SXA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Hi All,

Thanks for your replies which confirmed my observations, sorry about the
slip up on the call sign I did mean SXV (135.8 KHz). I havn't seen it shift
before.

Regards,

Gary - G4WGT - IO83qp

Web : http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Alan Melia
Sent: 09 April 2005 18:36
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: Re: SXA


Hi Gary I think you are refering to the Greek Naval station at Marathon (??)
We have had contact with them (I am not sure but the call-sign I have is
SXV) and the actual transmission is USB on a sub carrier about their
registered frequency. I noticed a few days ago they seemed to have drifted a
bit low, I assume they have adjusted the sub carrier generator.frequency.
This 100Hz moving around is quite normal for this transmission. When I was
trying to monitor them a few years ago to try and get propagation
information I had to keep checking their frequency, to make sure they were
still in the RX passband. By way of comparison my CFH receiver has not been
retuned for 18 months.

Cheers de Alan G3NYK

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary - G4WGT" <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
To: "LF (Rsgb LF Group)" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: 09 April 2005 16:58
Subject: LF: SXA


> Hi All at LF,
>
> Is my equipment or my eyes deceiving me or has SXA moved up in frequency
by
> 100Hz ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Gary - G4WGT - IO83qp
>
> Web : http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor
>
>
>