Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
From: "Gary - G4WGT" <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 14:36:48 +0100
Message-ID: <NKEMLGOEKANPNJOBFBAFCEPACOAA.g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <44F9922F.27288.68B3EEC@localhost>
Subject: RE: LF: G3XDV signal
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Mike,

I am monitoring on two different receivers & two different antennas (LF
vertical & LF Mini-Whip). In view of what you have said about 50Hz hum I
have at present only got half my ground rods connected due to making
possible grounding improvements which I have not finished yet (rained off),
surely that can't cause me to see an image at plus & minus 50 & 100 Hz?

Gary.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Mike Dennison
Sent: 02 September 2006 14:16
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: G3XDV signal


Yes it was. See my direct e-mail for the result of this test. 50 and
100Hz suggests hum somewhere doesn't it.

Mike
====

> If that was you at about 137.700 with a 1.5 min carrier at about 1258z
> then I have images at about plus & minus 50Hz & 100Hz.
>
> Is anyone else watching please.
>
> Gary - G4WGT.
>